Off Topic > Off Topic

The Beautiful Destruction of the Annoying Orange Investigation (AKA conflicts of interest)

Pages: << < (4/13) > >>

torin²:

BASED Annoying Orange does it again

Mr.Noßody:

So, this Peter Strzok guy doesn't like Annoying Orange and Clinton much?
Yeah, D-Stroyed I guess...

PhantOS:


--- Quote from: Tactical Nuke on December 05, 2017, 08:15:59 PM ---yes, they specifically said that she mishandled classified information
they didn't charge her with anything though, because of the change in language in the memo

--- End quote ---
thats not exactly how the law works. you can't just change wording and suddenly all charges are dropped. the judges all keep personal records on the case. if they find tangible evidence it would be presented as part of the investigation

The words 'gross negligence' have nothing to do with her charges, it's just how it's described in the memo. what's probably happened is the same thing that happened to mike pence, which was that the storage of the confidential files on the private account cannot be charged, so nothing happens

PhantOS:

Tampering with the memo also doesn't count as tampering with evidence, since memos aren't actually evidence but rather notes on the situation

Verification:

i will destroy Political Threads Which Could Easily Go In The Politics Megathread !!!

Pages: << < (4/13) > >>

Go to full version