| Off Topic > Off Topic |
| Police Shoot and Kill an Unarmed Daniel Shaver |
| << < (23/58) > >> |
| RedGajin:
police reform when |
| Red Spy:
why are we arguing about something that happened almost two years ago again |
| Rockinboy2000:
DON'T LOOK WITHIN 33.1 DEGREES OF A COUNTER TERRORIST OR YOU WILL BE SHOT FOR EACH 10 STEPS YOU MUST EXECUTE A 360 DEGREE SPIN |
| Ragequit:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=BnKYL7AWNQo |
| Nonnel:
--- Quote from: Ragequit on December 08, 2017, 07:55:01 PM ---you don't think he was concerned for his own or fellow officers' safety? if someone presents a threat to you, whether or not it is intentional or genuine, you're going to feel endangered and take action to get out of danger. the officer neutralized a threat he felt was real, and looked very real. people have sustained multiple shots and killed several people. shaver was not intent on killing, obviously, but if he had been and the officer only shoots once, the guy very well could have taken lives --- End quote --- I've been thinking about this and lemme just ask, can we at least agree there was negligence here? That this could've gone totally smoothly had the officer acted different? The man was completely disarmed and laying on the ground with his hands on his head. They 100% could have walked over and cuffed him, frisked him, whatever. Instead he kept yelling at him to crawl (wtf?) and warning him he was going to shoot and kill him if he didn't comply Even before that, the report they got was presumably "rifle spotted in a hotel room." why didn't they walk up to the door and ask "do you have a rifle in the room? what reason do you have to be keeping a rifle in your room? do you have a license? does the hotel know you're keeping this here?" Y'know, the kinda stuff you'd ask instead of yelling at the guy to shut up and "the time for diplomacy is over" while he's trying to explain. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |