| Off Topic > Off Topic |
| Fox News says killing N.N. will save the internet |
| << < (2/15) > >> |
| SeventhSandwich:
--- Quote from: Aide33 on December 16, 2017, 01:53:08 PM ---I like how every single time any issue comes up, people refer to these bills as Obama-era --- End quote --- It's a dog-whistle term that activates the microchip which enables neo-conservative circlejerking. |
| Cappytaino:
--- Quote from: OrangeMan³ on December 16, 2017, 01:54:47 PM ---wow im so glad media companies can censor people instead of internet providers --- End quote --- Cite an example of companies barring access to legal material, please. I honestly have never heard of this happening, just people saying it "could happen" --- Quote from: SeventhSandwich on December 16, 2017, 01:55:06 PM ---It's a dog-whistle term that activates the microchip which enables neo-conservative circlejerking. --- End quote --- implying pro-NN isn't also a circlejerk |
| OrangeMan³:
--- Quote from: SeventhSandwich on December 16, 2017, 01:55:06 PM ---It's a dog-whistle term that activates the microchip which enables neo-conservative circlejerking. --- End quote --- lol you think people have microchips in them? which subreddit did this come from? |
| Ceist:
--- Quote from: Cappytaino on December 16, 2017, 01:56:11 PM ---Cite an example of companies barring access to legal material, please. I honestly have never heard of this happening, just people saying it "could happen" --- End quote --- Didn't you ask this question in the NN thread and got your examples?? --- Quote from: OrangeMan³ on December 16, 2017, 01:59:01 PM ---lol you think people have microchips in them? which subreddit did this come from? --- End quote --- it's a joke, one you didn't understand either lmao |
| Ipquarx:
--- Quote from: Cappytaino on December 16, 2017, 01:56:11 PM ---Cite an example of companies barring access to legal material, please. I honestly have never heard of this happening, just people saying it "could happen" --- End quote --- http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/telus-cuts-subscriber-access-to-pro-union-website-1.531166 It's a Canadian example but still 100% valid. Not only were they blocking access to legal content, they were blocking it because it was a pro-union website. A lack of Net Neutrality allows for complete and total censorship. And here's the thing, it won't always be as obvious as this. It could be as simple as throttling a particular website down to insanely low speeds, something that's very difficult to test for. They can do it without detection. Do you want that? |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |