Not comparable.
i think it's somewhat comparable. unless badspot explicitly stated somewhere that blockland was targeted for little kids instead of the tween/teenager user-base it has always had.
my point is that a product resulting in popularity among a different audience then the one it was directed toward doesn't make the target audience ineligible to enjoy it.
which is why badspot made sure that blockland was safe and appropriate for ages between 4 and 12 right?
i think im being needlessly argumentative, but I dont think "4+" was his target audience.