So what's the point in putting rules and war crimes in war?

Author Topic: So what's the point in putting rules and war crimes in war?  (Read 3554 times)

so that their forces only kill who they're supposed to, i.e. the opposing forces.  things like biological, chemical and nuclear warfare are effective, yes, but they destroy everything else, not just their military presence, and we generally don't want that
this, agent orange caused so many birth defects and deaths of innocent civilians back in vietnam

huh????
if you don't remember this oldmeme you wasn't alive in 2007


How lord tony envisions himself whenever he posts a question like this


[img width =900]https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/meme/images/9/95/%D0%A3%D0%98%D0%A1%D0%9C4.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20170507085307&path-prefix=ru[/img]
How lord tony envisions himself
fixed


this, agent orange caused so many birth defects and deaths of innocent civilians back in vietnam
and long term health impacts for the soldiers that handled it.

literally of all of tonys topics, this is probably the one with the most potential discussion so try not to derail it from the outset

That's why it's handicapped to not be able to imprison civilians.

You don't know if they are being told to attack soldiers or not.
and regardless there are always going to be innocent civilians on the field that are intolerable collaterals