Author Topic: Nintendo sues rom sites for 12 million  (Read 4158 times)

So let's assume that Nintendo will never make any sort of remakes or reboots of these games and just steal it from them. That's a good plan

This reminds me of the time when someone leaked bushidos weapon pack and as a result he decided not to finish it and everyone called him a selfish starfish because he took action against the theft of his work. That was definitely a good time. Because as soon as you release a product it is officially finished and never being made or updated again therefore it's perfectly fine to distribute it endlessly

Congratulations. That's the dumbest stuff Ive ever heard.
"You gotta wait forever to play those games, dumbass!"

Congratulations. That's the dumbest stuff Ive ever heard.
"You gotta wait forever to play those games, dumbass!"
nobody said forever. they could be making a new gamecube virtual console next year. The 'forever' is just your loving handicapped justification for distributing intellectual property without paying for it. I'm sure you could pick a bunch of other stuff to demonize Nintendo for protecting their own property which they own 100% of and are entitled to do whatever they want with because they paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to make it.

nobody said forever.
Mother 3

The 'forever' is just your loving handicapped justification for distributing intellectual property without paying for it.
What does this even mean?


What I don't understand is: if the game is not available for sale, why do roms matter? Roms aren't sold. Nobody is making money off of Nintendo's content.
Do you really think Nintendo is worried about lost sales of games that aren't being sold?

They should take down roms for games that are currently being sold in that case. However, what happens when they inevitably stop selling that too?
Roms are the only way to play games that are inaccessible or discontinued aside from buying from third parties, which Nintendo also gets nothing from.

If Nintendo wants to take down all roms they should prolly start selling their own, or at least announce plans to do so.

Imagine justifying the theft and illegal distribution of a product because you have to pay $200 for it
it's literally abandonware

it's literally abandonware

Oooh, but "maybe nooooot" though.
No, but it legally isn't abandonware.

it's literally abandonware
doesnt make it not their property

it's literally abandonware
it literally isn't unless it was publicly announced that development on the franchise has ceased

What I don't understand is: if the game is not available for sale, why do roms matter? Roms aren't sold. Nobody is making money off of Nintendo's content.
Do you really think Nintendo is worried about lost sales of games that aren't being sold?

They should take down roms for games that are currently being sold in that case. However, what happens when they inevitably stop selling that too?
Roms are the only way to play games that are inaccessible or discontinued aside from buying from third parties, which Nintendo also gets nothing from.

If Nintendo wants to take down all roms they should prolly start selling their own, or at least announce plans to do so.
these are all valid points but in the end they are justification for theft. it doesn't matter what nintendo does with their own property because its legally and rightfully theirs. all this 'why didnt they do x or y' is moot. its like killing someone with a knife and saying that its not legally killing them because the person you killed was annoying. it doesn't matter how annoying they were, it doesn't matter what they were doing, or what weapon you used, you still killed them. so all the underlying what ifs and speculation about the circumstances are moot because in the end you did kill them. these rom sites did illegally give intellectual property. it doesn't matter what nintendo does, it matters what the sites did, which is illegally gve intellectual property. if nintendo wants to reboot the roms, they can. its their property. if they want to make playing the rom legal, then they can. but they didn't. so until they do, nobody loving pirate roms unless they actually want to get sued. when they do get sued, its 100% their loving fault because they understood the consequences of their actions, and nintendo is 100% right to sue them.

all these arbitrary 'its not being worked on anymore' or whatever isnt even worth arguing against because its entirely arbitrary and nintendo doesn't need to give a reason for why they sue someone for stealing their property.
« Last Edit: November 13, 2018, 07:38:41 PM by thegoodperry »

Oooh, but "maybe nooooot" though.
the very first video game, pong, which was made in 1972, is still being rebooted and re-released by atari today, over 40 years later. whats so inconceivable about an old game still being on a development cycle? like what rom in your collection of pirated roms is actually never being worked on again in any form? what proof can you present that a franchise will never be worked on again in any capacity, besides a press release by the IP owner saying that it's officially abandoned?

Mother 3
mother 3's ip rights are still active. lucas was just used in the most recent smash.
« Last Edit: November 13, 2018, 07:45:58 PM by thegoodperry »

Does corporate richard taste that good?
idk, how did vid.me's richard taste

who loving cares about that though. these people do not deserve a lifetime of debt for delivering something that Nintendo failed to do for 20 years.