You could make a (futile) argument that exclusive games are anti-consumer in nature but, eh, really?
It'd be like arguing different brands of toilet paper having exclusive.. no that's terrible
It'd be like arguing that different brands of potato chips having exclusive flavors is anti free market. Bitch how?
Idk man this is dumb
Because they're not competing with quality of flavor, or quality of potato, or advertising, they're "competing" with exclusive flavors. If for 5 years Doritos made nacho cheese flavor chips, but then suddenly only Lays had the license to sell nacho cheese flavor chips, they're nearly identical to the Doritos one, the only difference is lays made them, quality is different, but there is no alternative. How do you protest that, not but it? No alternatives means you gotta go ahead and abstane completely from it, and Everytime I say that as an option most people flip out and say "why should I give it up if no one else will anyway?", And it's a fair point?
If there is no alternative, there's no way to protest without taking a major sacrifice. If you've been following Kingdom Hearts you're not going to just skip a game because "it's exclusive to a stuffty platform, and I'm going to protest it by not buying it.".
These options arent improving, they're stagnating. They're stagnating because they're not competing. Why would they need to improve, they've got several fanbases by the balls.
