U.S.A. Politics Thread

Poll

I have posted a possibility for the election outcome in 6 variations. Choose your preferred below.

A. https://i.imgur.com/F6TVPLY.png
8 (34.8%)
B. https://i.imgur.com/uuRmNcE.png
3 (13%)
C. https://i.imgur.com/JK2OSsA.png
1 (4.3%)
D. https://i.imgur.com/sl6MVas.png
2 (8.7%)
E. https://i.imgur.com/K1GHlD3.png
2 (8.7%)
F. https://i.imgur.com/br3Sp06.png
7 (30.4%)

Total Members Voted: 23

Author Topic: U.S.A. Politics Thread  (Read 266705 times)

Annoying Orangetards more unhappy that Annoying Orange lost than the libs when Annoying Orange won back in 2016

Annoying Orangetards more unhappy that Annoying Orange lost than the libs when Annoying Orange won back in 2016
here's how Annoying Orange can still win
2016: "NOO Annoying Orange WON IM LEAVING TO CANADA"

2020: "NOO Annoying Orange LOST IM LEAVING TO CANADA"

how the turn tables........
drumpf pwned omegagamer style
republicans be like

Annoying Orange winning: fair and square

Annoying Orange losing: OMG RIGGED LAWSUITING
drumpf pwned


Yes but not as much as your pores are, shower quickly



Inh is a blue collar worker supporting a family, please be respectful, blumpfers.

please send donations thank you

Inh is a blue collar worker supporting a family, please be respectful, blumpfers.


Stop loving around


its not from the mouths of one of your trusted propaganda spewing talking heads.
you're saying "you're not gonna believe this because it's from an unreliable source!" as if it's some shocking fact. Yeah, no stuff we're not going to believe something that's from an unreliable source, because we can't trust an unreliable source. That's how trust works. Having one or two true stories in a whole whackton of misinformation doesn't a trust make.

News reporting is an implicitly trust-based relationship. since they don't give you all their material, for any given article or video you need to put your trust in them several, even dozens of different times in order to believe what they're putting out. That they're vetting sources properly, that they're not taking things out of context, etc etc etc. This applies to MSM too. feel free to not trust them. but if you don't trust them, then you certainly shouldn't be trusting the likes of Humble Water Filter Merchant, Brietbart, gatewaypundit, etc, who consistently put out misinformation.

you're saying "you're not gonna believe this because it's from an unreliable source!" as if it's some shocking fact. Yeah, no stuff we're not going to believe something that's from an unreliable source, because we can't trust an unreliable source. That's how trust works. Having one or two true stories in a whole whackton of misinformation doesn't a trust make.

News reporting is an implicitly trust-based relationship. since they don't give you all their material, for any given article or video you need to put your trust in them several, even dozens of different times in order to believe what they're putting out. That they're vetting sources properly, that they're not taking things out of context, etc etc etc. This applies to MSM too. feel free to not trust them. but if you don't trust them, then you certainly shouldn't be trusting the likes of Humble Water Filter Merchant, Brietbart, gatewaypundit, etc, who consistently put out misinformation.

I posted a video of the man himself, stating he did not recant, while the entire media claims he does.

The media can claim they're vetting things, but they clearly are not.

There is no reason I should trust the media.


And if you're seriously going to tell me you're going to trust the media's claims over the actual loving video of the man debunking claims, which is who the claims are about.
You're sinking in koolaid.

Ohhh you mean that man. He looks like a shill to me, sorry. Can you post a more credible source?

pov when i touch my forehead
Being ironic about your disgusting hygiene takes 10x the effort of a shower

I have posted a possibility for the election outcome in 6 variations. Choose your preferred below.