U.S.A. Politics Thread

[Insert Name Here²]

Annoying Orangetards more unhappy that Annoying Orange lost than the libs when Annoying Orange won back in 2016

[Ad Bot]

[TlTO]

Annoying Orangetards more unhappy that Annoying Orange lost than the libs when Annoying Orange won back in 2016

here's how Annoying Orange can still win

2016: "NOO Annoying Orange WON IM LEAVING TO CANADA"

2020: "NOO Annoying Orange LOST IM LEAVING TO CANADA"

how the turn tables........

drumpf pwned omegagamer style

republicans be like

Annoying Orange winning: fair and square

Annoying Orange losing: OMG RIGGED LAWSUITING

drumpf pwned

[Insert Name Here²]

am i being owned

[Crook]

Yes but not as much as your pores are, shower quickly

[RADICAL_PROBLEM_USERINCEL]

am i being owned

Wash your hair

[Insert Name Here²]

nsfw

[Kumquat]

Inh is a blue collar worker supporting a family, please be respectful, blumpfers.

[Insert Name Here²]

please send donations thank you

[b00by_GENERATOR]

Inh is a blue collar worker supporting a family, please be respectful, blumpfers.

Stop loving around

[Insert Name Here²]

pov when i touch my forehead

[Ipquarx]

its not from the mouths of one of your trusted propaganda spewing talking heads.

you're saying "you're not gonna believe this because it's from an unreliable source!" as if it's some shocking fact. Yeah, no stuff we're not going to believe something that's from an unreliable source, because we can't trust an unreliable source. That's how trust works. Having one or two true stories in a whole whackton of misinformation doesn't a trust make.

News reporting is an implicitly trust-based relationship. since they don't give you all their material, for any given article or video you need to put your trust in them several, even dozens of different times in order to believe what they're putting out. That they're vetting sources properly, that they're not taking things out of context, etc etc etc. This applies to MSM too. feel free to not trust them. but if you don't trust them, then you certainly shouldn't be trusting the likes of Humble Water Filter Merchant, Brietbart, gatewaypundit, etc, who consistently put out misinformation.

[Master Matthew²]

you're saying "you're not gonna believe this because it's from an unreliable source!" as if it's some shocking fact. Yeah, no stuff we're not going to believe something that's from an unreliable source, because we can't trust an unreliable source. That's how trust works. Having one or two true stories in a whole whackton of misinformation doesn't a trust make.

News reporting is an implicitly trust-based relationship. since they don't give you all their material, for any given article or video you need to put your trust in them several, even dozens of different times in order to believe what they're putting out. That they're vetting sources properly, that they're not taking things out of context, etc etc etc. This applies to MSM too. feel free to not trust them. but if you don't trust them, then you certainly shouldn't be trusting the likes of Humble Water Filter Merchant, Brietbart, gatewaypundit, etc, who consistently put out misinformation.

I posted a video of the man himself, stating he did not recant, while the entire media claims he does.

The media can claim they're vetting things, but they clearly are not.

There is no reason I should trust the media.


And if you're seriously going to tell me you're going to trust the media's claims over the actual loving video of the man debunking claims, which is who the claims are about.
You're sinking in koolaid.

[TlTO]

Ohhh you mean that man. He looks like a shill to me, sorry. Can you post a more credible source?

[RADICAL_PROBLEM_USERINCEL]

pov when i touch my forehead

Being ironic about your disgusting hygiene takes 10x the effort of a shower

[TlTO]

I have posted a possibility for the election outcome in 6 variations. Choose your preferred below.