Ok. I have updated the post to specify that we are not certain how many of the 274 killed in this specific attack were civillians (although I am sure we can both agree that the 64 children killed were unlikely to be Hamas agents)
Unfortunately it is difficult indeed to get exact numbers when Israel says only 100 Palestinians were killed. (that is a rather high number, still when rescuing only 4 people and killing 3 people that were supposed to be rescued but ok.) Of those Israel itself has only confirmed that 17 of them were militant combatants. That is still at least 83 civilians. (247 if we are going by the health ministry that has to deal with the influx of injuries after every one of the assaults)
But here are some more non al-jazeera sources:
https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-hamas-war-news-06-09-2024-61eb1be9a9d0cf2dbf250cd4a8ed4dbfhttps://www.democracynow.org/2024/6/10/headlines/israel_kills_274_gazans_including_64_children_in_attack_on_nuseirat_that_freed_4_hostageshttps://www.cnn.com/2024/06/09/middleeast/israel-hostage-rescue-gaza-intl-hnk/index.htmlhttps://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/health-ministry-in-gaza-says-274-palestinians-died-in-israels-raid-that-rescued-4-hostageshttps://theintercept.com/2024/06/10/nuseirat-massacre-israel-hostage-rescue-gaza/https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israel-rescues-four-hostages-gaza-palestinians-say-50-dead-israeli-assault-2024-06-08/Yes, Al-Jazeera is the primary news agency that has up-to-date reporting of the events in Gaza, and thus is going to be the most easily cited when these events occur instead of waiting two days for CNN or APNews to print the same stories.
I'm also taking a brief look through that list of controversies, some of it does seem troubling. Some of it, not so much. I will leave a tldr for those who don't want to read that whole link.
In Algeria, the government shut off residents power to prevent them from seeing Al-Jazeera's coverage of Algerian military's abuse of power. Not so troubling.
In Australia they were criticized for a documentary revealing a far-right politician's connections to the US's gun lobbyists. Not so troubling.
In Bangladesh, they are accused of downplaying atrocities committed by Pakistani militia groups, while criticizing Bangladesh's democratic government. Yeah, that's troubling.
In Bahrain, they were banned for being too pro-Israeli. Not so much troubling as confusing.
In Egypt, they were condemned for their bias against Egyptian royal government and support of the Muslim Brotherhood organisation,
(An organization originally founded to combat Britian's occupation in Egypt and promote Islamist teachings. It supported Egypt's transition into a democracy, and during the Arab Spring movement in 2012 achieved the first democratically elected president in Egypt, who was later ousted for failing to curtail the Brotherhood's pro-islamic extremism after their election. It's a very complicated subject and worthy of an entirely different thread). That is to say, for this point, It's definitely complicated. And I can agree this could troubling.
I unfortunately have to run to the store, but I can continue to summarize this list later. It should suffice to say for now, that yes, this news source, like many others, are biased around what their audience is concerned about. That is why, when pressed for more sources, I don't stick to just one. When devising a brief summary of events, as I have been doing, however, (in a thread that practically no one reads anyways) there is little benefit for me to be so extensive.
And again I update my posts through edits to avoid being spammy, but if you prefer i can just double post.
