You've done it before a bunch though, just throwing that out there...
LET IT CONTINUE!
No, I don't think I have. And this doesn't include 2007.
Understand?
Nope. I was really only acting "serious" to Pixl, because his reply made almost no sense; I was obviously only referring to jony. And to you, because your comment was as pointless as the rest of your posts, which leads me to my other point:
"A fallacy is a component of an argument which, being demonstrably flawed in its logic or form, renders the argument invalid in whole."
I could see where you're coming from, it's just, there was no arguement to begin with. But if we look at it from a different viewpoint, I guess it would make sense. But a fallacy would require something that is true, but at the same time stupid, because then, it wouldn't have the ability to make the arguement pointless.
And right now, I am admitting that I am acting out of line. But because I'm aware of the fact that I know I will never stop, please, just end it here by not replying to this, Thief.