| Off Topic > Off Topic |
| Nothing anymore |
| << < (13/27) > >> |
| Jsk2003:
--- Quote from: Moppy on June 03, 2009, 02:12:34 PM ---First, I want to point out the countadictions in evolution and howit was founded. 1: First, Darwins canaries changed beaks why? Because they adapted to their environment. You think "Hey! Because they change beaks, why not change entire figures and altogether new speicies?" I tell you THAT is rediculus. They were only changing their beaks,not their speicies.If they can change their beaks, why can't they change their other parts? From a video that summed a thing up: Small change over small period of time = Large change over large period of time. 2: Evolution says that "A looong time ago, Therewas a tiny moulecule that sundenly It fused with another molecule for nogood reason.(Note that this is by chance) Then they fused with another molecule lying around, then they turned into a living thing some how." Stupid huh? Why would they get together by chance when they can't even do it with our help now? And don't say "we haven't even tried", We have, and we failed.Learn biology please. 3:The fossils are not Proof. First, radio carbon dating is not accurate at all. Studies show that there was an artifact from a volcano that dated 20,000 years old, but in fact, the people living around the area say that they can recall that the volcano erupted 20 years ago. Is there a source for this?Second, If there was evolution, where are the mixed chikencow-rexes?A chicken, cow, and t. rex couldn't mate due to being different species spread far apart on the tree of life. --- End quote --- --- Quote from: Moppy on June 03, 2009, 02:23:58 PM ---Youve just contradicted yourself. You've proven that such a thing, such as bones, could be fosilized in less than millions of years. Therefore, bones could be only 50 years old. and in the case of noahs flood, a few thousand. --- End quote --- Water doesn't speed up the process of fossilization. |
| Inv3rted:
--- Quote from: Jsk2003 on June 03, 2009, 02:26:53 PM ---Water doesn't speed up the process of fossilization. --- End quote --- I think we've established that he doesn't know anything. |
| Osak:
--- Quote from: Inv3rted on June 03, 2009, 02:04:04 PM ---Light is matter. Photons might not have mass when they are not moving, but because an object moving at the speed of light will have infinite mass, photons have mass as they exist in the Universe. Freeze a photon and you'll get a Nobel prize. Actually, I've done more research, and photons do not have mass and therefore are not matter. --- End quote --- Cool, you agreed with me :D --- Quote from: Jsk2003 on June 03, 2009, 02:26:53 PM ---Water doesn't speed up the process of fossilization. --- End quote --- Ice lowers it. |
| Moppy:
--- Quote from: Jsk2003 on June 03, 2009, 02:26:53 PM ---Water doesn't speed up the process of fossilization. --- End quote --- And when the heck did I say it did? |
| Block Builder:
--- Quote from: Moppy on June 03, 2009, 02:12:34 PM ----snip- --- End quote --- 1. DNA can mutate and cause large changes. Why do you think lions and tigers have so many similarities and differences but are the same species? Humans, even today, are still mutating. Dwarfs for example had usually have mutated DNA. This can even be passed to their kids to where they have it too. 2. Evolution doesn't say anything like that, but, if I remember correctly, the big bang theory claims that 2 particles collided with each other. This would be possible if there was nothing, because there would be nothing to stop them and each would have a tiny bit of gravity, causing them to come together. 3-A. Carbon dating isn't the only way to find out how old something is. Also, a volcano erupting wouldn't change an artifact if it was beneath the earth far enough. it could though, destroy rocks and soil above it allowing water and wind to expose it. 3-B. Like I said in 1. But still, fossils have shown early humans that appear slightly more ape like. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |