| Off Topic > Off Topic |
| Nothing anymore |
| << < (14/27) > >> |
| All of us:
--- Quote from: Moppy on June 03, 2009, 02:33:34 PM ---And when the heck did I say it did? --- End quote --- when you used the word flood |
| Block Builder:
--- Quote from: Moppy on June 03, 2009, 02:23:58 PM ---Youve just contradicted yourself. You've proven that such a thing, such as bones, could be fosilized in less than millions of years. Therefore, bones could be only 50 years old. and in the case of noahs flood, a few thousand. --- End quote --- But even if something was fossilized faster, it would still be fossilized at that date. Bones that are a million years old will show that they are a million years old no matter how fast they fossilized. |
| Osak:
--- Quote from: Sandvich on June 03, 2009, 02:26:26 PM ---Internet + Religion = War --- End quote --- Exactly. Block Builder started it saying that Moppy is wrong. --- Quote from: Block Builder on June 03, 2009, 02:36:13 PM ---But even if something was fossilized faster, it would still be fossilized at that date. Bones that are a million years old will show that they are a million years old no matter how fast the fossilized. --- End quote --- Bones go underground for some reason. So how are we to know that? Forget it. |
| All of us:
NOBODY KNOWS loving ANYTHING FOR ABSOLUTE CERTAINTY [/END] |
| Moppy:
--- Quote from: Block Builder on June 03, 2009, 02:36:13 PM ---But even if something was fossilized faster, it would still be fossilized at that date. Bones that are a million years old will show that they are a million years old no matter how fast they fossilized. --- End quote --- The reason I shows millions of years is bwecaus radio carbon dating is innacurate. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |