Off Topic > Off Topic

Why Give More Than 100 Years To A Convict?

Pages: << < (3/3)

Terror:

Isn't bail/tariff in relation to the amount of years sentenced? Unless ofcourse he was sentenced without bail.

Katamari007:

because they are smart :D

they know that medical sciences are improving, and that in 2020 our average age deaths shall be 1890 years!!!! MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Packer:


--- Quote from: Katamari007 on June 30, 2009, 05:47:07 AM ---because they are smart :D

they know that medical sciences are improving, and that in 2020 our average age deaths shall be 1890 years!!!! MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

--- End quote ---
I am not amused.


--- Quote from: General Omega on June 30, 2009, 01:23:37 AM ---if the guy is 90 and he has to wait 20 years before he dies, I think life would do the job earlier.

--- End quote ---
It was a joke....?

Ector:

I think multiple life penalties are there so if he wins the trial for one penaltie, he'll have to win the others.

Ronin:


--- Quote from: General Omega on June 30, 2009, 01:23:37 AM ---if the guy is 90 and he has to wait 20 years before he dies, I think life would do the job earlier.

--- End quote ---
That's a problem they have with war criminals who are in their 70's and 80's now. Such as the Khmer Rouge camp officers.

I don't have a problem with these rulings because 99.9% of the time the person has done something reprehensible to the point where they can't be a part of civilized society. Madoff lied to everyone and networked a giant Ponzie scheme, and the people/charities/organizations will never see that money ever again. That could have been part of someone's life savings, down the tubes.

On top of that they're setting an example as a way of deterring people that would try similar means of scheming. Moral of the story is: everyone loses.

Pages: << < (3/3)

Go to full version