Author Topic: Skechers. (Read 2854 times)

AlphaicX · August 04, 2009, 07:39:35 PM

Quote from: Duckmeister on August 04, 2009, 07:25:35 PM

The point isn't that it's in the wrong section. The point is that he made it at all. Something so freakin' trivial is only complained about by idiots like Creola to get attention.

Quote from: Duckmeister on August 04, 2009, 06:40:06 PM

oh crap i agreed with someone my point is useless

Smooth move 1: make a topic about a shoe brand that does something that isn't even annoying like they ruined your life

Smooth move 2: put the topic in drama

Smooth move 3: acted like you didn't hear when 5 people said "wrong topic idiot"

Smooth move 4: idiot.

Considering 4 isn't a valid reason, that's 2/3 "smooth moves" about it not being in the right topic.
You should have had more points of why he shouldn't have posted this at all if that was your point.
Also it's not like he can move it to off-topic, if you are telling someone to do something that's impossible for them to do, DON'T HIT THE POST BUTTON.

Ad Bot · Advertisement

Duckmeister · August 04, 2009, 07:44:58 PM

Quote from: AlphaicX on August 04, 2009, 07:39:35 PM

Considering 4 isn't a valid reason, that's 2/3 "smooth moves" about it not being in the right topic.
You should have had more points of why he shouldn't have posted this at all if that was your point.
Also it's not like he can move it to off-topic, if you are telling someone to do something that's impossible for them to do, DON'T HIT THE POST BUTTON.

So I simply chronicle the history of his smooth moves, something that I had no control of, and just because he did two things out of three that have to deal with the post being in the wrong section, that means my point must be about those two things.

I couldn'tve just picked one of those 3 smooth moves to make my post about? Just because I detailed what he did means that if the majority of what he did was X, my post, no matter what the actual words are (Y), have to be about X.

Learn2Logic

AlphaicX · August 04, 2009, 07:50:50 PM

Quote from: Duckmeister on August 04, 2009, 07:44:58 PM

So I simply chronicle the history of his smooth moves, something that I had no control of, and just because he did two things out of three that have to deal with the post being in the wrong section, that means my point must be about those two things.

I couldn'tve just picked one of those 3 smooth moves to make my post about? Just because I detailed what he did means that if the majority of what he did was X, my post, no matter what the actual words are (Y), have to be about X.

Learn2Logic

If you mean to make a point about something, you should EXTRACT MORE INFORMATION from what is typed. I could have typed 3 more reasons why he should never have posted this if I wanted to.

Duckmeister · August 04, 2009, 07:53:36 PM

Quote from: AlphaicX on August 04, 2009, 07:50:50 PM

I could have typed 3 more reasons why he should never have posted this if I wanted to.

And I didn't.

Woo.

Oh wait, reasons? I have a lot of reasons for him never posting it. In fact, I have a lot more than 4 reasons. You can read them, in my posts. The thing is, is that you think they are all bunk because I then provided everyone the history of his wrongdoing and only included what I was reasoning about once.

See what you are not understanding?