| Blockland Forums > Modification Help |
| RTB Development |
| << < (217/889) > >> |
| Wedge:
--- Quote from: Ephialtes on March 13, 2010, 07:11:27 AM ---What are your thoughts and concerns about this? --- End quote --- This takes the burden of trying to make a up a criteria for the bargain bin and gives it to the community. Especially with decals and prints which people always seem to bitch about, "OMG WHY DID YOU BARGAIN BIN THIS FAEC LOOK YOU APPROVED THIS ONE!" I'm all for it. I do have a couple of concerns though. One of them is that there might be a good addon with a bad presentation, although I suppose that would get noted when it was tested and approved. My biggest concern is that people won't actually bother judging them. Maybe you can have the modbot post something to the news feed that says something like "I have 10 new ad-dons today for you to judge." You would need to think of ways to encourage them to judge. Maybe people who judge accurately get weighted more and get some kind of tag on their RTB profile (totally did not steal that from newgrounds). |
| Ephialtes:
--- Quote from: -Jetz- on March 13, 2010, 10:53:27 AM ---What happened to the original concern that when the "SUPER MEGA ROCKET BOMBER" (Which for this purpose is a repackaged rocket launcher that overwrites the original datablocks, has ugly particle edits, and is rediculously overpowered) gets failed, you have tons of raging people who thought it looked so cool that all the other problems shouldn't have mattered. --- End quote --- I am less concerned about people raging over RTB and dismissing it now that it is more established in the community. --- Quote from: Wedge on March 13, 2010, 11:13:49 AM ---This takes the burden of trying to make a up a criteria for the bargain bin and gives it to the community. Especially with decals and prints which people always seem to bitch about, "OMG WHY DID YOU BARGAIN BIN THIS FAEC LOOK YOU APPROVED THIS ONE!" I'm all for it. I do have a couple of concerns though. One of them is that there might be a good addon with a bad presentation, although I suppose that would get noted when it was tested and approved. My biggest concern is that people won't actually bother judging them. Maybe you can have the modbot post something to the news feed that says something like "I have 10 new ad-dons today for you to judge." You would need to think of ways to encourage them to judge. Maybe people who judge accurately get weighted more and get some kind of tag on their RTB profile (totally did not steal that from newgrounds). --- End quote --- I think there is some responsibility on the part of the submitter to really "sell" their add-on. They should be thinking of it like a finished product that they must then promote in order to get people to use it. If people can't be bothered to do that bit then it reflects badly on RTB if we allow half-assed submissions to be floating around. I'm thinking some kind of reward system where you get points based on whether you voted for the decision the reviewer ends up making. Then it becomes a sort of gambling minigame too. I do have some sort of plan for a "currency" within RTB but I haven't said much as I don't want everyone jumping to some sort of "lol RPG" conclusion about it, and I haven't finished thinking it through. I reckon a lot of people will be more than willing to partake in the judging but we'd still need that extra encouragement from the rest. Perhaps also you lose a point if you downvote something that people have overwhelmingly upvoted (and was subsequently approved) to deter people who just run about voting everything down. |
| Freeze:
What would the points get you? (if anything). NINJAEDIT: I suppose it would be fun to compete to see who could get the most points. |
| mctwist:
--- Quote from: Freeze on March 13, 2010, 12:24:16 PM ---What would the points get you? (if anything). NINJAEDIT: I suppose it would be fun to compete to see who could get the most points. --- End quote --- Get the biggest E-snake that is. |
| Chrono:
I'm sure there could be some use for them. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |