| Off Topic > Off Topic |
| Kids and politics |
| << < (94/117) > >> |
| Inv3rted:
--- Quote from: Rughugger on October 09, 2009, 01:18:11 PM ---I'll concede to that. However, he treats me like an inferior so I'm going to do the same. --- End quote --- So taking the stance that you're wrong automatically makes me attack you as inferior? k You can't measure superiority the way you are. You simply can't. I thought perhaps in the 13 years you've had on the planet longer than I, you would know that. You're defeating yourself in several ways here. "I never said he was. I conceded that he makes many good points on other threads which I agree with. My argument in this thread is that he feels morally superior to Christians simply because they believe in a God he tries to find as many faults in as possible and that as a result the very moral fabric of our society is on a plummeting decline to mass hysteria. A good argument stems from having supporting content for both sides, not just one. A biased argument isn't an argument at all. Technically this whole argument of God vs Science is fought by biased people and therefore nothing should be taken as complete fact. There is way too many variables to prove both sides wrong, yet no one on either opposing side is providing any evidence of right from the other side. Save for my little blurb now and then over the forums of how I think Science is God's way of allowing us to understand how he works." What the forget? You're saying that because I'm the only one with supporting evidence that this argument is invalid? My point should be ignored? Or are you saying that people shouldn't be biased towards their own point of view when arguing about said point of view? And how is science "God's way?" We invented the concept. And if you say that God made us invent it, I will have to say then we have no free will whatsoever. |
| Bisjac:
if we are free to science thx to god. then i demand more abortions and stem cells. |
| Rughugger:
--- Quote from: Inv3rted on October 09, 2009, 02:28:41 PM ---So taking the stance that you're wrong automatically makes me attack you as inferior? k You can't measure superiority the way you are. You simply can't. I thought perhaps in the 13 years you've had on the planet longer than I, you would know that. You're defeating yourself in several ways here. "I never said he was. I conceded that he makes many good points on other threads which I agree with. My argument in this thread is that he feels morally superior to Christians simply because they believe in a God he tries to find as many faults in as possible and that as a result the very moral fabric of our society is on a plummeting decline to mass hysteria. A good argument stems from having supporting content for both sides, not just one. A biased argument isn't an argument at all. Technically this whole argument of God vs Science is fought by biased people and therefore nothing should be taken as complete fact. There is way too many variables to prove both sides wrong, yet no one on either opposing side is providing any evidence of right from the other side. Save for my little blurb now and then over the forums of how I think Science is God's way of allowing us to understand how he works." What the forget? You're saying that because I'm the only one with supporting evidence that this argument is invalid? My point should be ignored? Or are you saying that people shouldn't be biased towards their own point of view when arguing about said point of view? And how is science "God's way?" We invented the concept. And if you say that God made us invent it, I will have to say then we have no free will whatsoever. --- End quote --- No. You attack me on a religious or mental basis whether I agree with you or not. No, I'm saying that a decent argument comes from someone who isn't completely biased to one side of a subject. That's the point of philosophical debate is to welcome counter arguments in order to expand one's knowledge, not flat out ridicule and bash it because it doesn't fit with your beliefs. We didn't invent anything that some other civilization hasn't before. Just because we can't congruently prove there is other life out there doesn't make mathematics, theory, science, culture and religion tangibly ours. It's human arrogance that dictates everything else has to go by our definition of something. Which is one main reason people find so many faults in the Bible. They assume God works on our rules, he doesn't. They assume all of his wrath was unjustified slaughter of millions of innocents, it wasn't. They like to think that he somehow forces people of their own free will to go and bomb abortion clinics in his name. He doesn't. That is all humanity and their gross misinterpretation of his rules. And before you go on about those old "Judeo-Christian" excuses, that's from the Jewish bible which was written by man over a thousand years ago, which makes it easy to redefine God's will by a couple of extra scribbles and words. It is perfectly known humans have re-translated and manipulated the teachings in the Bible to coincide with the times. Modern evidence shows that there was more than one Magdaline. One of them, most possibly was a 13th descipel and more or less wife to Jesus. I can accept this apparent blasphemy because I wasn't there when that stuff went down but I can keep my mind open to the new evidence coming through. I realize that the times back then were heavily prejudiced against women. Hell the fork was considered a satanic object until the 15th century. I know religion is full of faults, but that's not God's fault. That's all on Humanity because humanity is not perfect itself with or without religion. |
| Otis Da HousKat:
--- Quote from: Bisjac on October 09, 2009, 02:39:11 PM ---if we are free to science thx to god. then i demand more abortions and stem cells. --- End quote --- God bless America! |
| Atomshock:
--- Quote from: Grumpy on October 02, 2009, 09:10:15 PM ---obama is a bad president thats all i know --- End quote --- this. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |