Off Topic > Off Topic
Net Neutrality
Wynd_Fox:
--- Quote from: TheLegomaster on October 31, 2009, 04:55:49 PM ---Guise, this probably means no research.
--- End quote ---
The supreme court says research being illegal is unconstitutional.
Block Builder:
--- Quote from: Rughugger on October 31, 2009, 04:59:17 PM ---Stock up while you can. (I'm kidding of course)
--- End quote ---
I'm still going to do it though.
Inv3rted:
--- Quote from: Wynd_Fox on October 31, 2009, 05:13:41 PM ---The supreme court says research being illegal is constitutional.
--- End quote ---
wat
Outlawing research violates the First Amendment.
Then again, so do a lot of things that are legal...
Block Builder:
--- Quote from: Visage on October 31, 2009, 03:11:00 PM ---you were wrong for trusting the governments word
--- End quote ---
If you don' hold up the people above you, they fall down and crush you.
Muffinmix:
--- Quote from: Wynd_Fox on October 31, 2009, 05:13:41 PM ---The supreme court says research being illegal is constitutional.
--- End quote ---
If it's in the interests of the state, then it's constitutional. Or in the US' case, if it's in the interest of the companies and commercial groups, then it's constitutional.
--- Quote from: Block Builder on October 31, 2009, 02:23:52 PM ---Does this mean no more Loli and extremely violent videos/games?!? D:
--- End quote ---
They've already arrested a few individuals for acquiring lolicon books. Basically they arrested people for buying drawings, never mind the fact that they could have used the resources and police personnel/time to stop something that's actually destroying lives like the Drug traffickers or child research distributors. Isn't that cute? Oh yeah and it probably causes the child enthusiasts to NOT seek help if they ever need it out of the fear of being ostracized in the middle of this witch hunt, which inadvertently leads to actual child abuse and rapings and such. You can tell the court put allot of thought into this. I'd actually like to know how many professional psychologists they consult before pressing a decision based on a mental condition, if any.
As for banning violent games, I can't see that happening. The US depends on violent games to desensitize candidates for the army.