| Off Topic > Off Topic |
| More reliable source? |
| << < (6/108) > >> |
| WRB852:
And there's no proof that there are pink elephants dancing under the surface of Mars, but that doesn't exempt you from ridicule of trying to convince others that there are. |
| Digmaster:
--- Quote from: Game master pro on November 09, 2009, 11:21:43 PM ---Care to share it then? I'm not Christian, I don't believe in God. But there is not any proof there isn't one. --- End quote --- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot Pretty much states there can be no proof there is no god, only that there is one. Thus one can do on more then to refute evidence. |
| Wynd_Fox:
--- Quote from: Skele on November 09, 2009, 11:23:05 PM ---Humans wrote the bible, did they not? --- End quote --- You're the most reliable source, being God and all. |
| Inv3rted:
--- Quote from: WRB852 on November 09, 2009, 11:21:38 PM ---Who's to say he did. Oh wait, no one lol --- End quote --- Argument from Ignorance appears to be valid to idiots, and idiots alone. --- Quote from: Wynd_Fox on November 09, 2009, 11:23:19 PM ---Wait, that's not what I meant. There are others. --- End quote --- A scientific theory that's entirely different from the big bang? Provide me with an example. |
| Tom:
@Inv3rted The def I have says. "theory |ˈθēərē; ˈθi(ə)rē| noun ( pl. -ries) a supposition or a system of ideas intended to explain something, esp. one based on general principles independent of the thing to be explained : Darwin's theory of evolution." |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |