Off Topic > Off Topic
More reliable source?
WRB852:
And there's no proof that there are pink elephants dancing under the surface of Mars, but that doesn't exempt you from ridicule of trying to convince others that there are.
Digmaster:
--- Quote from: Game master pro on November 09, 2009, 11:21:43 PM ---Care to share it then?
I'm not Christian, I don't believe in God. But there is not any proof there isn't one.
--- End quote ---
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot
Pretty much states there can be no proof there is no god, only that there is one. Thus one can do on more then to refute evidence.
Wynd_Fox:
--- Quote from: Skele on November 09, 2009, 11:23:05 PM ---Humans wrote the bible, did they not?
--- End quote ---
You're the most reliable source, being God and all.
Inv3rted:
--- Quote from: WRB852 on November 09, 2009, 11:21:38 PM ---Who's to say he did. Oh wait, no one lol
--- End quote ---
Argument from Ignorance appears to be valid to idiots, and idiots alone.
--- Quote from: Wynd_Fox on November 09, 2009, 11:23:19 PM ---Wait, that's not what I meant. There are others.
--- End quote ---
A scientific theory that's entirely different from the big bang? Provide me with an example.
Tom:
@Inv3rted
The def I have says.
"theory |ˈθēərē; ˈθi(ə)rē|
noun ( pl. -ries)
a supposition or a system of ideas intended to explain something, esp. one based on general principles independent of the thing to be explained : Darwin's theory of evolution."