There is no evidence for the existence of the soul. You are accepting its existence on faith alone, which completely breaks the point of the scientific method. You cannot say there is a soul before you have evidence for its existence. It's just as likely that we're just artificial intelligence entities in some sort of supercomplex video game created by beings in another dimension. You don't subscribe to that belief, and yet it has the same amount of backing that the existence of the soul does. Do you not see the flaw in your thinking? You have allowed religion to destroy the scientific method.
Did you completely miss the part about that being my beliefs? I don't need proof, I have faith; and it hasn't been disproved yet, so I have no reason not to believe it.
The burden of proof is on the one who asserts something. In this case, you. You're an idiot for subscribing to this logic.
