NASA: 2012 myth debunked

Off Topic > Off Topic

<< < (2/9) > >>

Doorman:

--- Quote from: Ector on November 17, 2009, 08:13:36 AM ---I thought of something.
What if, it was 2012 BC instead of 2012 AD?

--- End quote ---
Then we wouldn't be here, now would we?

Zenthos:
Doorman, the mayan calander was very different, and they just found the end and the equivalent of the date they thought time would end on their calender, I don't think 2012 actually means anything number wise. (If it did, it wouldn't be know because I wouldn't consider the birth of jesus to be the beginning of time.)

Doorman:

--- Quote from: Zenthos on November 17, 2009, 08:53:42 AM ---Doorman, the mayan calander was very different, and they just found the end and the equivalent of the date they thought time would end on their calender, I don't think 2012 actually means anything number wise. (If it did, it wouldn't be know because I wouldn't consider the birth of jesus to be the beginning of time.)

--- End quote ---
I know, the birth of Jesus is definitely not the beginning of time. I was just pointing out the flaw in his logic saying that if it was meant to be in BC and not AD, then we wouldn't be here for the world would have ended then.

Besides, the world doesn't end according to Mayan callender, but rather a new period begins in it. Maybe something will happen to change our world? I don't know, nor do I care.

Blastdown:
Typical. No surprise here.

Bisjac:
nasa said this nasa said that.

who did they say it to? where is the real interviews? why don't the article actually explain WHY these theories all are wrong? it simply repeats over and over that they are wrong.

proof is fail

Navigation

 Message Index

Go to full version