1
Off Topic / Re: ITT: Pirate Names.
« on: March 18, 2011, 05:46:18 PM »
Did someone say pirates?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants,[1] also known as the McDonald's coffee case and the hot coffee lawsuit, is a 1994 product liability lawsuit that became a flashpoint in the debate in the U.S. over tort reform after a jury awarded $2.86 million to a woman who burned herself with hot coffee she purchased from fast food restaurant McDonald's. The trial judge reduced the total award to $640,000, and the parties settled for a confidential amount before an appeal was decided. The case was noted by some as an example of frivolous litigation;[2] ABC News called the case "the poster child of excessive lawsuits,"[3] while others stated that the claim was "a meaningful and worthy lawsuit."[4]
Liebeck's attorneys argued that McDonald's coffee was "defective", claiming that it was too hot and more likely to cause serious injury than coffee served at any other establishment. Moreover, McDonald's had refused several prior opportunities to settle for less than the $640,000 ultimately awarded.[5] Reformers defend the popular understanding of the case as materially accurate, note that the vast majority of judges who consider similar cases dismiss them before they get to a jury,[6] and argue that McDonald's refusal to offer more than a nuisance settlement reflects the meritless nature of the suit rather than any wrongdoing on the company's part.[7][8][9]
This thread is stupid.
Hey, if you get off to that, fine. Don't expect to remain safe in your mother's basement when you go rape an infant, though. The forums will not save you from that.
Hey Archano, do you have those images saved on your computer? Or are you doing it the same way I am? (google images, save image, tinypic, post?)
I'm an starfish to people who deserve it. It's not my fault that almost everyone here deserves it.
-snip for over loveualization of a minor-
It's hard to see a difference between the two.
The girl is a toddler btw.
Really? I can go a day without seeing two 9 year old girls half-naked.
That'd have to be 2nd... A.R.C. owns that crown.
That's just terrible. You're obviously in such a blind rage, that you've turned to blatantly insulting me. You need to realise that you aren't that godly, respected, forum member you want to be.
Did you catch the fact that he has over 20 different signatures and names?
Use words, not images.