Oh if it isn't my old foe from long ago.
http://forum.blockland.us/index.php?topic=161892.0Well heres what I have to say this time.
So here I am taking time out of my busy schedule to let you and maybe a few other people know that antipluralism has its stronghold among stingy spielers. The nitty-gritty of what I'm about to write is this: Peddling academicism to all comers is less wise than giving free amphetamines to school children, although it's probably just as profitable for Bobah. In my opinion, grenades and flamethrowers would do less damage, though. The point is that I have never read reasoning more absurd or sophistry more gross than that used by Bobah to convince people that free speech is wonderful as long as you're not bashing her and the rapacious beguilers in her crew. I put that observation into this letter just to let you see that if she gets her way, we will soon be engulfed in a Dark Age of incendiarism and indescribable horror. That's why I'm telling you that some people think I'm exaggerating when I say that I will let Bobah's record speak for itself. But I'm not exaggerating; if anything, I'm understating the situation.
Bobah always looks the other way when one of her worshippers gets it in his head to eliminate those law-enforcement officers who constitute the vital protective bulwark in the fragile balance between anarchy and tyranny. Apparently, the principle laid down by Jean-Marie Collot d'Herbois during the French Reign of Terror still holds true today: Tout est permis quiconque agit dans le sens de la révolution. I use such language purposefully—and somewhat sardonically—to illustrate how when she lies, it's consistent with her character, for Bobah is a liar and the mother of lies. Another reason that many people consider it consistent is that Bobah has tried encouraging every sort of indiscipline and degeneracy in the name of freedom. She has also tried undermining the intellectual purpose of higher education. Why does Bobah do such things? The bigger question is the following: What exactly is Bobah's point? That's the big question. If you knew the answer to that then you'd also know why the reason Bobah wants to heat the cauldron of terror until it boils over into our daily lives is that she's totally renitent. If you believe you have another explanation for her biased behavior, then please write and tell me about it.
Ladies and gentlemen, Bobah has recently been observed changing children's values from those taught in the home to those considered chic by nugatory pauteners. There is an eerie parallel here with Bobah's previous attempts to step on other people's toes. The only difference is that she seizes every opportunity to paralyze needed efforts to deal with the relevant facts. I, hardheaded cynic that I am, cannot believe this colossal clownishness. Any sane person knows that our battle with Bobah is a battle between spiritualism and aspheterism, between tradition and subversion, between the defenders of Western civilization and its enemies. With the battle lines drawn as such, it is abundantly clear that many people think of Bobah's infelicific, nitpicky arguments as a joke, as something only half-serious. In fact, they're deadly serious. They're the tool by which uneducated sad sacks will establish a world government complete with a world army, a world parliament, a world court, and numerous other agencies that make all of us pay for Bobah's boondoggles one day. A second all-too-serious item is that with Bobah so forcefully feeding information from sources inside the government to organizations with particularly yellow-bellied agendas, things are starting to come to a head. That's why we must stop defending the damnable, spineless status quo and, instead, implement a bold, new agenda for change.
Bobah's statements serve only to make people increasingly nerdy. At some point, we'll reach a “nerdy event horizon” where everything in the universe will be nerdy. At that point, it will no longer matter that the vast majority of Bobah's zealots have no interest in making the world safe for democracy. They would rather stroke their fragile egos, regurgitate meaningless tripe, and sycophantically prostrate themselves before the idiotic dribble that underlies Bobah's bleeding-heart reportages. I can assure you that there has been little scientific or scholarly brown townysis of Bobah's materialistic fusillades. This is a glaring omission in strategic discourse, one that can be rectified only by examining how Bobah not only lies but brags about her lying to her trained seals.
I don't know when fogyism became chic, but Bobah recently stated that she is a champion of liberty and individual expression. She said that with a straight face, without even cracking a smile or suppressing a giggle. She said it as if she meant it. That's scary because I feel that she has insulted everyone with even the slightest moral commitment. Bobah obviously has none or she wouldn't rot our minds with the hallucinatory drug of vigilantism. It's sad that her most full-throated claim is that we can change the truth if we don't like it the way it is. One would think she could strive for a little more accuracy there. She could perhaps even admit that she likes campaigns that devise cranky scams to get money for nothing. Could there be a conflict of interest there? If you were to ask me, I'd say that if you were to try to tell her fans that she obsesses not with what she can do for this country but with what she can extract from it, they'd close their eyes and put their hands over their ears. They are, as the psychologists say, in denial. They don't want to hear that I have often maintained that reasonable people can reasonably disagree. Unfortunately, when dealing with Bobah and her helpmeets, that claim assumes facts not in evidence. So let me claim instead that one can consecrate one's life to the service of a noble idea or a glorious ideology. Bobah, however, is more likely to bar people from partaking in activities that cannot be monitored and controlled.
Although the historical battle between good and evil is exemplified in the philosophical division between Platonic order and Aristotelian chaos, if you study Bobah's obtuse wisecracks long enough, you'll come to the inescapable conclusion that if we don't weed out people like Bobah who have deceived, betrayed, and exploited us then Bobah will make a mockery of the term “anthropogeographical”. This message has been brought to you by the Department of Blinding Obviousness. What might not be so obvious, however, is that Bobah's goombahs are too lazy to disentangle people from the snares set by Bobah and her slaveys. They just want to sit back, fasten their mouths on the public teats, and casually forget that Bobah keeps saying that space aliens are out to lay eggs in our innards or ooze their alien hell-slime all over us. For some reason, Bobah's idolators actually believe this nonsense.
Bobah's cheerleaders have the audacity to acquire power and use it to indoctrinate the most devious bloodsuckers you'll ever see. That shouldn't surprise you when you consider that I have no doubt that she will create widespread psychological suffering when you least expect it. She'll probably do so under the pretense of “humanitarian intervention” or some other equally inapposite appellation, but the reality is that when it comes to Bobah's vituperations, I allege that we have drifted along for too long in a state of blissful denial and outright complacency. It's time to fight to the end for our ideas and ideals. The sooner we do that the better because Bobah possesses no significant intellectual skills whatsoever and has no interest in erudition. Heck, she can't even spell or define “erudition”, much less achieve it.
Bobah has been peddling all sorts of half-baked and discredited theories. For example, she insists that we ought to worship impudent controversialists as folk heroes. As if that weren't bad enough, Bobah's reaction to our latest crCIA diligently fulfils the first law of reactive politics. That is to say, do something, no matter how hostile. Issue orders. Look busy. Forget about how Bobah can fool some of the people all of the time. She can fool all of the people some of the time. But she can't fool all of the people all of the time.
Bobah has for a long time been arguing that it's okay to leave the educational and emotional needs of our children in the jaundiced hands of malign geeks. Had she instead been arguing that the vastly inflated humanitarian forecasts of her belief systems are unrecognizable when compared to their inevitable outcome, I might cede her her point. As it stands, the leap of faith required to bridge the logical gap in Bobah's arguments is simply too terrifying for me to contemplate. What I do often contemplate, however, is how I don't know what makes her think that she is the one who will lead us to our great shining future. Maybe she's been sipping cuckoo juice. The fact of the matter is that Bobah should stop calling me a lusk philosophunculist. Although I've been called worse things by better people, Bobah's legatees insist that the masses are untrustworthy and unfit for citizenship. Every store in the country should have that chiseled in large letters over the entryway. Maybe then people would grasp that if it weren't for Bobah's double standards she would have no standards at all. Hence, it's entirely a waste of time even to address Bobah's hypocrisy. That's why I'll state merely that her smear tactics have caused widespread social alienation, and from this alienation a thousand social pathologies have sprung.
Whenever I feel particularly bold, I like to point out to Bobah's shock troops that “sanguinary”, “moralistic”, and “truculent” seem the most appropriate adjectives to describe Bobah's communications. In response, I always receive the familiar kabuki of official outrage. That doesn't bother me because if I were a complete sap, I'd believe Bobah's line that the more paperasserie and bureaucracy we have to endure, the better. Unfortunately for her, I realize that Bobah's camorra loves rescuing privatism from the rubbish heap of history, dusting it off, slapping on a coat of cheap sophistry, and marketing it as new and improved. This is nothing less than a betrayal of the many by the few. I have just enough stomach left to address one last instance of Bobah's vindictive imbecility: Bobah sincerely believes that she knows the “right” way to read Plato, Maimonides, and Machiavelli.