Author Topic: Valve is coming to Linux  (Read 1441 times)

Don't take this the wrong way, but I can't find anything Windows does that Linux doesn't.
Play most games, run most programs.

Don't take this the wrong way, but I can't find anything Windows does that Linux doesn't.

have to emulate EVERYTHING. more overhead = stuffttttty
even the 100s of drivers a computer needs arent that compatible lol

and god forbid the new game, or new hardware, or new program, driver, update comes out.
as these things tend to happen daily

issues arise in updating or using constantly.


Linux is Open-Source, allowing the ability to make games [easier]. Plus, it's free.
Windows is supported by millions of developers, making many people prefer it. It is cheaper than getting a Mac.
Macintosh is immune to almost all the viruses that Windows [and some Linux] systems get, and is easy to set up.
End of discussion.

End of discussion.

wow end of discussion huh.
i guess we can conclude that each OP only has 1 difference. fantastic.

Linux is Open-Source, allowing the ability to make games [easier]. Plus, it's free.
Windows is supported by millions of developers, making many people prefer it. It is cheaper than getting a Mac.
Macintosh is immune to almost all the viruses that Windows [and some Linux] systems get, and is easy to set up.
End of discussion.
Open source has nothing to do with the ability to develop games unless your game is a "Guess The Kernal Crashing Point" game.

Open source has nothing to do with the ability to develop games unless your game is a "Guess The Kernal Crashing Point" game.
Small, simple games. That's what I meant.

Why cant we ever just appreciate something like this without arguing :'(

Play most games, run most programs.
Almost every program has a linux equivalent, at least 3/4 of what you're saying is untrue

VALVEBOX GOING TO RUN STEAMLINUX OF SORT!!1!

The difference to the user is in terms of configurability

With linux you always have a choice. There's different ways to achieve a great many things, but you need some technical know-how to do it. If you have that know-how you'll be a lot more productive when using Linux than Windows. Configuring it all from the ground up will be a pain but you know exactly what's in your operating system.
With windows, not so much. You don't need so much knowledge, it works pretty much out of the box, everything is tested for compatibility, etc. development of third party applications is still fairly open, though.
With mac, even development is shut up tight. The network protocols are forgeted up simply so if you want to use macs in an office network, you're probably going to need mac servers as well (there's another $8,000 down the drain). You do get the advantage of a unix shell though, so stuff you can do in a linux terminal, a lot of it can be done the same way on a mac.

Ultimately, it comes down to one thing: What you need to do. If you need the extra configurability but need it to 'just work', go for windows. If you just need a functioning OS and an empty wallet, go mac! If you need it to be cheap and configurable and you really want to go through with it, grab a linux distro. There is no 'right' choice. It's all down to the user.

have to emulate EVERYTHING. more overhead = stuffttttty
even the 100s of drivers a computer needs arent that compatible lol

and god forbid the new game, or new hardware, or new program, driver, update comes out.
as these things tend to happen daily

issues arise in updating or using constantly.
Wine
Is
Not (an)
Emulator

yes it is lol.

if it dosnt emulate, then you woudlnt need it