Woah, so angry. I've not said anything about whether I disagree or agree with what's in the article. All I'm saying is you've misrepresented the contents of the article with your topic title, which you have. That's an alarmist title.
I'm angry? Instead of having a leveled debate over this, you decided that it would be necessary to say:
"Way to omit key parts of a headline, friend."
Again, I'm angry? And no. The title isn't misrepresenting. It's general, but as I've said at least twice, the OP is 2 lines, with an article explaining everything.