Lmao. Try and manage to include the entire headline in your topic otherwise you're being misleading. Probably related to the fact that you're some dumbass brainwashed Republican kid who swallows all all the crap your ignorant parents regurgitate from Fox News.
Saying "donating to X is illegal" implies every kind of donation is illegal. Saying "donating X to Y is illegal" is far more accurate and doesn't mislead the reader. Do you see how that works or do I need to break this down for you even further?
Are you really that loving stupid? Because I disagree with Bloomberg, I'm some brainwashed republican? I think it's time to jump off of your high horse and reconsider yourself. I've listed nothing but facts in the topic, and you're calling out the fact that I omitted "food" from the title. It's very amusing to me that someone in the UK is bashing an American Television Station and an American Party.
Again, are you really that loving stupid? I linked to an article from MSN (whom, for the record, is well known for liberal beliefs) explaining EVERYTHING. I gave 0 details in the OP about it, other than the article. And how is omitting "food" from the title causing confusion? Isn't donating food donating? I honestly feel bad for you.
And make sure you have your facts straight next time before you attack someone:
"For the record, I'm just attacking general stupidity of the government. Consider this an independent action."