Author Topic: Hypocracy and Hypocrates.  (Read 3160 times)

I think people use the "You're a hypocrite" as an excuse to get away with bad things.


Ignoring flame war. (or perhaps edging one on :D )

Wait, so you're saying it's good to be a hypocrite? And your logic is, if you've done it, it's ok to tell someone one thing then go out and do another? That's bullstuff. That's like saying it's ok for a murderer to preach nonviolence, or a doctor who smokes. I mean, once you're a hypocrite, your opinion on things becomes very dwindled. So if someone has done something but tell you to do another, and they themselves make no attempt to correcting their own wrongs, then you shouldn't listen to them. They know nothing of what they're talking about.
I'm not going to respond to every little tiny-ass point in there, but to sum it up:
What I meant was in some cases it's actually good, IN A WAY, to be a hypocrate.

Only if you know of both of the situation. If you were to make a "Master Cheif vs. Gordon Freeman", if you support Master Cheif, but only play HL2, you can use their facts against them.

Only if you know of both of the situation. If you were to make a "Master Cheif vs. Gordon Freeman", if you support Master Cheif, but only play HL2, you can use their facts against them.
Quite true.

Only if you know of both of the situation. If you were to make a "Master Cheif vs. Gordon Freeman", if you support Master Cheif, but only play HL2, you can use their facts against them.
I understand what you're trying to say; but supporting something doesn't mean that you can't do anything else but that.