Author Topic: I was inside a C-130 today  (Read 3712 times)

Hey Bones have you ever seen the YF-23 in person?

For Argentina they do.
I think they're wheeled so they have more mobility, but yes tracked vehicles are superior. Stryker are supposed to be weaker than an MBT, they're meant as a fast APC, and the MGS basically has the same armament as the original M1 Abrams. There's also Mortar Carrier Strykers and ATGM Strykers.

LAV's are wheeled too.
Define mobility? Because the only mobility of the Stryker I have seen is driving down a road and getting blown up or getting a tire deflated. They are too big for the c-130 anyway(too my knowledge).

best apc(plus it can fit in c-130, act as a mortar, atgm carrier, command vehicle, medic vehicle, ect)

i'm sorry gear

Define mobility? Because the only mobility of the Stryker I have seen is driving down a road and getting blown up or getting a tire deflated. They are too big for the c-130 anyway(too my knowledge).

best apc(plus it can fit in c-130, act as a mortar, atgm carrier, command vehicle, medic vehicle, ect)

i'm sorry gear
mobility as in speed. You can fit one stryker in a C-130






Actually is best IFV

Suddenly the Blockland forums is an expert at military equipment.

"Nerdiness" on a whole different level.



Hey Bones have you ever seen the YF-23 in person?

There were only 2 built and the program was cancelled in the early 90's. No.

The stuff I see isn't in a museum setting. It's operational aircraft.