Didn't read it, but what annoys me is the fact that you described your work as a "really stuffty unfunny paper", followed by "I'm really tired, and might as well make a stuffpost".
Then why did you bother posting this? Seriously, you've obviously put significant effort into this paper (enough for you to bother posting it here, atleast), and now want our opinion on the humor of this work and for us to show an appreciation for said effort, so instead of expecting massive criticism from the community and getting defensive by trying to pre-emptively conjure up excuses for the possible low quality of this work, why don't you just put a normal title like "A funny paper that I wrote - What do you think?"
Describing it as "stuffty" and "unfunny" just sets the scene for a bad piece of work, and biases people towards expecting something "stuffty" and "unfunny". If you're going to post something like this, at least be confident about it. I mean, you even have the bonus of being anonymous on the internet.
