CS.S vs CS.O

[Cdog1st]

Cs.O stands for their new one coming out its free to Counter-Strike Online vetter graphis more weps(my fav revolver) and more maps.
Wich so you like?

[Ad Bot]

[Colten]

Counter-Strike Online is a remake of Counter-Strike: Condition Zero targeted towards Asia's gaming market. It is being developed by Nexon Corporation of South Korea with oversight from license-holder Valve Corporation. It uses a micropayment model that is managed by a custom version of the Steam back-end

Counter Strike Source > This crap

[Jimmg]

I want vetter graphix

[UnDiViDeD]

It's made by Nexon, instant suck.

[nairb84]

If you have ever watched the CSO gameplay, it sucks, graphics are just as the same as 1.6 or CS:CZ, and also, I've heard you have to put more effort/"skill" into this game.

[Osak]

It's like Condition Zero expect that it's much more worse.

[ChexGuy331]

Counter-Strike Online has been out for a while. :|

And it sucks a lot of stuff, even for Condition Zero, which already sucked enough stuff.

And I hear 1.5>1.6

[Marcem]

Counter Strike. Source?  Counter Strike. Online? :*

[yuki]

CS:O is only for Asia, and it's just CS:CZ. CS:S uses source and therefor it's superior.

[WOLFPACK2]

It's made by Nexon, instant suck.

[Cdog1st]

Well I havn't really got into the news about it yet but I saw gameplay of it, it lags a lot so I guess.

[PawlBear]

I think I'll just stick to Counter Strike: For Kids.

CS:FK

[Harm94]

CS:O is only for Asia, and it's just CS:CZ. CS:S uses source and therefor it's superior.

So the gldsrc version sucks just because it doesnt have ragdolls or physics objects?

[ChexGuy331]

No, it sucks because it's incredibly broken and unbalanced.

[Osak]

It's a crappy version of condition zero, and condition zero was already disapointing.