request to fill a complaint

[Space Guy]

Give the normal Hammer control over other peoples' bricks built on yours as if they were your own, and the Wand as well if you have full trust. Stops the problem of full trust allowing you to go and wreck other people's builds, allows you to co-operate. I like it.

Do this. If they had trust to build on your bricks, it's like you have full trust with those specific bricks to destroy them. If they fully trust you outside your bricks, then it's like you built anything they build on yours - you can wand them and edit them to any extent.

[Ad Bot]

[homestsarrunner]

just edit the hammer so that it works like that and then you could also be able to build on those bricks if you need to

[AGlass0fMilk]

No, do not edit a main game thing.

Make a new one.

[homestsarrunner]

 but then if you dont know how to build something and someone does it for you but you cant rebuild it and you don't want them spamming on your builds then  you should also be able to build on top of there builds and if your in a city rp how are you gonna get it

[General Jake]

Please learn to use caps and punctuation. It makes me not have to reread what you say 50 times.
__

Maybe if bricks lose ownership to whoever's plate they're on? Not exactly sure how that'd work though.

[Space Guy]

Maybe if bricks lose ownership to whoever's plate they're on? Not exactly sure how that'd work though.

Like I said?

[mecha51]

yep yep, good idea.
many times i have seen narbs(another word for "noobs")blocking builds or boxing them up.
it should also apply to bricks that touch it in any way.

[General Jake]

Like I said?

More or less. Owning it instead of having trust on it.

[Pah1023]

So you mean when someone offer build trust and build on your thing then demote you to none you should be able to hammer hes bricks since it is on yours?

[Space Guy]

Yes.

[Warriorboy123]

I agree

[BobSevenSevens]

I agree