Combining the two:
Person 1: You're wrong!
Person 2: NO! You're wrong!
Repeat.
EXACTLY.
It all comes down to this. Each and every worldview's foundations are based on this tautology. You can't escape it. The foundations are there, and they always will be. The difference is this. Christianity does not contradict itself, humanism and it's subsets do. Christianity gives meaning and purpose to life, humanism destroys all meaning. Christianity is the basis for all good, humanism makes everything relative and let's evil run rampant. Christianity has always improved the world, and gives a wonderful basis for all law, ethics, knowledge, etc, instead of humanism which has led to genocide, anarchy, crime, and indoctrination. The choice is simple, if you are willing to submit to a God who you've been trying to hold away for so long.
You religious guys sure have a hard time believing something came from nothing, good thing god conveniently has ALWAYS existed, but even that theory still means god came from nothing.
And yet you evolutionists insist that matter came from nothing, and then from non-living matter comes living matter, and so on and so on. You can't criticize us for the very thing you do. Good thing I believe in a benevolent God, instead of impersonal matter. And besides, it's simple logic. Everything has to have a first cause. God is that first cause. We can't, and don't have to explain him, just as you evolutionists can't, and refuse to explain what happened before the big bang.
If you want to know why the big bang theory could have created the earth and why it's probable, think of this; Given a list of EVERY number, 0, 0.000000000000000000001, 0.00000000000000002, and all other numbers (in other words, INFINITE possibilities), and then you picked 1000 numbers and none of those numbers were 1, does that mean that you could never get 1? No. The more numbers you picked, the more likely (considering the total amount of numbers you've chosen) it is that you've picked one.
Given infinite time, it was bound to happen eventually.
But you can't prove that you were given infinite time. Time is an arbitrary requirement for evolution, made in lieu of having a reasonable, observationally and/or logically supported argument.