Though, who says it's a limited amount of time? Aside from duck. (That isn't rhetorical.)
So, you are going to just go back and forth and back and forth on this? Are you going with the guess that we had an infinite amount of time or are you going with the guess we had a limited amount of time? Or will you give it up and go with 7 days?
You religion guys are yet again saying science is pure speculation(learn what speculation means in science) and then saying believing in god is not? I mean can anyone here explain to me how believing in god is fact and 100% true and no one can disprove it? Where is this support that proves god I am hearing about.
God is certainly the most convenient answer, but when is the most convenient answer ever the right answer.
I already answered this question.
"EXACTLY.
It all comes down to this. Each and every worldview's foundations are based on this tautology. You can't escape it. The foundations are there, and they always will be. The difference is this. Christianity does not contradict itself, humanism and it's subsets do. Christianity gives meaning and purpose to life, humanism destroys all meaning. Christianity is the basis for all good, humanism makes everything relative and let's evil run rampant. Christianity has always improved the world, and gives a wonderful basis for all law, ethics, knowledge, etc, instead of humanism which has led to genocide, anarchy, crime, and indoctrination. The choice is simple, if you are willing to submit to a God who you've been trying to hold away for so long."
All foundations for worldviews are based on the exact same tautology. You can't criticize my worldview for doing exactly what your worldview does.
The rationalist bases his worldview on reason. The humanist bases his worldview on himself. The Christian bases his worldview on the Bible.
Quite pathetic of you to say that loving humanity for what it is is the root of immorality.
Loving a distorted, corrupt, inherently evil humanity is moral? I would rather try to change it for the good through Christ than let humanity destroy itself.
That is the sole reason I never liked religion, even if god existed without a doubt and he came around talking to everyone I would still hate religion. This god has the audacity to consider people who are good for fear of him more superior than people who are good because they know it is the right thing to do.
And you have the audacity to believe that your relatively infinitesimal self knows better than an infinite God who created you? How arrogant.
Besides the fact that what you said isn't even true. But that's another discussion.
Here's my religion:
The sun.
...No really, it has proven factors. It EXISTS, we can actually SEE IT, and without it we would all die.
How can you believe in things like reason and logic if your qualifications for existence means the absence of abstract properties?
