Author Topic: Methinks i cracked the code of Christianity  (Read 24936 times)

Distance is not the same as time, my good sir.

Also I'm still interested in an answer to my question a page back.

Just for clarification; "it" is "the amount of time the earth had to be created."
But you would have infinite time. I mean seriously guy, you would be dealing with an amount of time you cannot imagine.
If time is infinite, then distance tends to the infinite, according to the expansion concept.

Also, quote your question, please.

So, you are going to just go back and forth and back and forth on this?  Are you going with the guess that we had an infinite amount of time or are you going with the guess we had a limited amount of time?  Or will you give it up and go with the guess that says the earth was made in 7 days?

I dunno. I personally like the "guess" that it was made in a finite amount of time but actually had an infinite amount of time to be created. Although you still haven't answered my question. Even a simple, "no one knows gtfo" would suffice.

Exactly.

That made no sense.

If time is infinite, then distance tends to the infinite.

Also, quote your question, please.

Infinite by definition means unending, also

"Though, who says it's a limited amount of time? Aside from duck. (That isn't rhetorical.)

Just for clarification; "it" is "the amount of time the earth had to be created.""

Loving a distorted, corrupt, inherently evil humanity is moral?

Just because we are not perfect moral creatures doesn't mean we shouldn't love everyone.

Christianity preaches a lot of self hate.



That made no sense.

Infinite by definition means unending, also

"Though, who says it's a limited amount of time? Aside from duck. (That isn't rhetorical.)

Just for clarification; "it" is "the amount of time the earth had to be created.""
[/quote]Judgement day.


That made no sense.

Infinite by definition means unending, also

"Though, who says it's a limited amount of time? Aside from duck. (That isn't rhetorical.)

Just for clarification; "it" is "the amount of time the earth had to be created.""
Judgement day.

I was looking for more of a scientific explanation.

Also what do you mean that made no sense?

I was looking for more of a scientific explanation.

Also what do you mean that made no sense?
ಠ_ಠ


I can make smileys too, look!

(>^_(>o-o)>
The expression on my face was ಠ_ಠ

vague  (vg)
adj. vagu·er, vagu·est
1. Not clearly expressed; inexplicit.


"Though, who says it's a limited amount of time? Aside from duck. (That isn't rhetorical.)

Just for clarification; "it" is "the amount of time the earth had to be created.""
Oh that.
If time is infinite, then distance between particles tends to the infinite, according to the expansion concept.

So, take a time considerably before that limit where the particles were still huge distances apart, but it had not reached infinity yet, and there simply wouldn't be anything close enough to react.
There would be a time where the particles would have to double back to get back to the spot where Earth was and try and make it. That is impossible unless they hit other particles, which is impossible as they all would have vectors of (even slightly) different direction.
You can cap the time, yet the Earth would not have to be made in the finite time you set to try and complete the infinite number of events until you reached one that resulted in the creation of the Earth.

This all assumes that you roll huge amounts of poor scores on dice with billions of sides and don't create the Earth when it was made.

Just because we are not perfect moral creatures doesn't mean we shouldn't love everyone.

Christianity preaches a lot of self hate.

And where are you getting this concept of "love", anyways?  Oh right, you stole it from Christianity.

How can there be love, and how can there be hate, if everything is relative and has no meaning?  Why should anyone love anyone?  What's in it for them?  Does love give some benefit in the survival of the fittest realm?  How did love evolve?

All of this besides that what you said was wrong anyways.

Hate of self, no, hate of sin, yes.  Love of Christ for redeeming you in spite of your sin, yes.


And where are you getting this concept of "love", anyways?  Oh right, you stole it from Christianity.

How can there be love, and how can there be hate, if everything is relative and has no meaning?  Why should anyone love anyone?  What's in it for them?  Does love give some benefit in the survival of the fittest realm?  How did love evolve?

All of this besides that what you said was wrong anyways.

Hate of self, no, hate of sin, yes.  Love of Christ for redeeming you in spite of your sin, yes.
Note that he defined sin to begin with.

The thing is you don't argue about religion; no one will ever win, because everyone is too stubborn to belive in someone else's word, so it's best just not to give a stuff