my unfortunate events.

[Inv3rted]

You people act like the guy who stole it was just doing what should have been done because he didn't lock his locker.

[Ad Bot]

[Riot]

Oh come on.

No one can say someone "doesn't have a life" just because they use their time in a different way than yourself.

 But he said it in a way that games, headphones, and money is his life D:

[Wizard]

Yeah, your life sucks. You lost your Ipod 2g in a locker at your school and are mildly concerned about losing 50$. But those Haitians have it great.

[Reis03]

Your fault for not locking your locker or putting a screen lock on your iPod.
I always lock my locker. I always have my cell phone (which isn't worth much), my 16GB ZuneHD and my stuffty laptop. I honestly don't care about the cellphone if it gets stolen but I lock my locker just for my ZuneHD and my laptop.
Blows off steam by acting depressed because you failed to take precautions?

i do lock my locker but idk

[Mateo]

You people act like the guy who stole it was just doing what should have been done because he didn't lock his locker.

Of course the guy who stole it shouldn't have, but it's the OP's fault the thief was able to steal it in the first place.

i do lock my locker but idk

I call shenanigans.

[General Nick]

i do lock my locker but idk

Was it actually locked or are you just saying you lock you locker?

[Reis03]

what you mean? as soon as you close the locker it locks. im sorry to make you guys mad.

[Inv3rted]

Of course the guy who stole it shouldn't have, but it's the OP's fault the thief was able to steal it in the first place.

Let's use a hypothetical.

Say a man is shot to death on the street. Would a bullet proof vest have stopped it? Sure. Is it the man's fault for not wearing it? No.

A lock is no different from a bullet proof vest in that they are both meant to stop a crime. It is a measure of insurance, but not having it is not someone's fault. The perpetrator of the crime is the only one at fault.

[Mateo]

Let's use a hypothetical.

Say a man is shot to death on the street. Would a bullet proof vest have stopped it? Sure. Is it the man's fault for not wearing it? No.

A lock is no different from a bullet proof vest in that they are both meant to stop a crime. It is a measure of insurance, but not having it is not someone's fault. The perpetrator of the crime is the only one at fault.

But if every citizen was given a free bullet proof vest it would be the man's fault.

[Inv3rted]

But if every citizen was given a free bullet proof vest it would be the man's fault.

What kind of logic is this? The sole responsibility is on the man who pulled the trigger.

[Mateo]

What kind of logic is this? The sole responsibility is on the man who pulled the trigger.

If the man was given, for free, the means to prevent his own death and he himself refused that protection, it is that man's own fault. Just as this random kid was given, for free, the means to prevent his own property from theft.

[RedSaturn]

Thats why you shouldn't use turtle beaches, you be a loser and need a headset that basically cheats, it bites you in the ass.
As the 16gig you are an idiot, mines in my pocket at all times at school

[Inv3rted]

That doesn't work at all. There are logistical problems with using a lock or wearing a vest. What if the man didn't want to deal with that?

The point is that you can not take the blame away from the perpetrator at all and put any of it on the victim.

[Reis03]

Thats why you shouldn't use turtle beaches, you be a loser and need a headset that basically cheats, it bites you in the ass.
As the 16gig you are an idiot, mines in my pocket at all times at school

how is it cheating? and i took it ou cause i had gym next.

[Bisjac]

i love my android and it's streaming harddrive from my computer. so i can (basically) have infinite space for music.
and if its lost or stolen, well they cant use it once i call and disable its serial.
and im insured for a new free one, with all my apps and saved infos external-digitally stored that will reinstall for me as i left it.