Author Topic: Westboro Baptist Church  (Read 24757 times)

Because every heteroloveual, married couple has kids/raises them right. Guess what kid, two wo/men are just as able to raise a kid as a man and woman. Just because they can not create a child in one or the other doesn't mean they should be together and look out for each other. Marriage is about two people that love each other and want to be together forever. (At least, that is how I see it.)
True dat. I completely agree. <3

Though, he is entitled to his opinion. :P


And I'm entitled to stab him in the face with a very sharp stick.

No, what he meant was that nature normally intended that Males fit perfectly with the females as they were built for each other.

 I'm not saying Homoloveuality is wrong because it isn't. A genetic disorder is something hard to live with, its just some people chose to be ignorant to each other because he was born that way.
 Its like in the 50's, everyone made fun of the handicapped kid because he talked funny, and in class he tried to fit a box into a sphere.

And in the 2010's we're still making fun of the handicaps.

You rage you lose?

Fun rave-party game.

No, what he meant was that nature normally intended that Males fit perfectly with the females as they were built for each other.

I agree, but did nature create marriage? No, humans did and that is the point I was trying to make.

Okay, wonderful, you don't care. No stop thinking people are going to keep worrying about what you're going to write to a point where they will address you or your every reply in any topic that has anything to with religion/gays.
Hypocrisy at its finest!

Whenever I post, you'd immediately mention gays!
Religion has nothing to do with this. You're thinking of inv3rted.

I don''t hate gays that much anymore

This phrase kinda makes you an starfish.

You still hate gays, just not that much.

Because every heteroloveual, married couple has kids/raises them right. Guess what kid, two wo/men are just as able to raise a kid as a man and woman. Just because they can not create a child in one or the other doesn't mean they should be together and look out for each other. Marriage is about two people that love each other and want to be together forever. (At least, that is how I see it.)
I truly believe that gay and lesbian couples take better care of kids then others.
It's just that the relationships in every circumstance I've encountered seem to be very unstable and full of arguing. Still, theres the same with Hetroloveual couples. I just see it more with homoloveual couples.

It's just that the relationships in every circumstance I've encountered seem to be very unstable and full of arguing. Still, theres the same with Hetroloveual couples. I just see it more with homoloveual couples.

It has nothing to do with loveual preference. If two starfishs date eachother, it'll happen.

It has nothing to do with loveual preference. If two starfishs date eachother, it'll happen.
All gay people are starfishs?

I know.

I agree, but did nature create marriage? No, humans did and that is the point I was trying to make.

 Agreed.


Yea they protested at my school last weekend - basically just hate speech against gays etc

We countered with an Anti-Anti-Gay rally
I think I'd tolerate kissing a guy (once, just once) just to show those bastards what for.

Now it's morons like this that set such a horrible example for the rest of the religion.

I was pondering this earlier today:

Religion, as you should know, was created to explain the unexplainable at the time; volcanoes, earthquakes, etc. But the world has gone through many different religions:

Catholic/Christian, Hebrew, Muslim, Buddhism, or Mormon

Now, these are mostly modern religions, still practiced and believed in today, some of the earlier ones were the Greeks and the Romans. As I said, all of these religions were attempts to explain the unexplainable.

Now with modern science, we are able to explain most of the things that religion was created for. Thus, today there is much more atheism, but that is not the point.

What I was pondering was the different religion levels in humanity. When we were a young species, we could barely explain what made the sky roar and the trees sway. So we created multiple gods to explain every little thing. Then we started getting more technologically advanced, able to explain more things, so religions reverted to a one god "theory" if you will. So as humanity progressed through the ages, and with the enlightment, you could argue that religion has formed or changed to fit the scientific establishment of the time. Such as, the Greeks believed one of their gods, Poseidon, or the Roman, Neptune, controlled the sea and earthquakes. But as a Catholic/Christian, do you believe that "God" controls those? Or do you accept scientific fact that the sea is controlled by the celestial bodies, the wind, and other Earthly features?

So, in summary, I believe as a "Non-Believer" or an "Atheist", that religions of all sorts are not technically related to science, but are, as I said, formed by it.