Author Topic: AMD's 6 core processor  (Read 5708 times)

send me dem parts
the price of the computer construction will pay for a real copy so then i can send you the demo because it has no more use to me

forget no, i'd rather buy a prebuilt

Well my family is pretty generous when it comes to birthdays, so around 100-200$ or so.
I'll sell some old computer parts anyways. And by then the price of it might just drop if i'm lucky.
I get around $300 average per birthday, but last time I got a nice fat $500 in cash from the family.

I'm hopeful for my graduation too. If I get another $500 I could probably buy an AMD hex core, but I'd need to change the motherboard though too.

Who the forget cares about a hex core?


Like i said, i've been surviving on a single core for the past 4 years.

Although i would kill for a dual or quad core ;-;

That's why im buying a new computer >:D

Who the forget cares about a hex core?
i would kill for a dual or quad core ;-;
I am confused.

I am confused.
He's never been introduced to the wonders of multi-core processing.

Such a shame.

i dont feel like building my own.
No electrical engineer would say this.

No electrical engineer would say this.
Hey Otis while you're here, is there much of a difference between AMD's 6-core and Intel's 6-core?

...It's good because you payed $700 for it?

So, I could sell you a piece of stuff for $1000 and you'd buy it because you think it's a damn fine piece of stuff? wtf
what
I'm saying I built a good computer, even though I only had around $700 budget.

I think this is starting to move into the "Only useful for scientific applications" category. A 3.4x4 OC'd to 5.0 is fine for gaming.

No electrical engineer would say this.
First off, I dont FEEL like building one, just because i dont want to.

Second off, Electrical engineer =/= Computer engineer


I am confused.

I have survived on a single core for a while, but i would like to have a dual or quad, i dont see the use in a hex though.

The difference from AMD's 6-core and Intel's is for large. Intel still prevails and oddly enough, AMD's Phenom II X4 965 performed better than The X6.

The difference from AMD's 6-core and Intel's is for large. Intel still prevails and oddly enough, AMD's Phenom II X4 965 performed better than The X6.
Source?

No matter how many cores these chip companies stack on to each other, we are still at a chip crCIA. Technology needs to actually advance, instead of stacking old tech onto one another for more power.

No matter how many cores these chip companies stack on to each other, we are still at a chip crCIA. Technology needs to actually advance, instead of stacking old tech onto one another for more power.
Hyperthreading. That was an advancement.

Doesn't the i7 920 have 8 cores?
No, although Octo-core microprocessors exist.

A version of the i7-Extreme has 6 cores, with a p.v.r of about 20.2.

The Phenom II x6 hits a p.v.r of about 19.8.

----------------------------
For a comparison, an Xbox 360 is 9.6, an entry level quad core is 9.2-12.6, and a high powered dual-core can get up to about 7.
----------------------------

They are pretty evenly matched, but Intel takes the cake by a small margin with their processor. I agree with radial about how companies need to just come up with more efficient technology already, rather than stacking.

Based on benchmarks from a source I can't remember, you will hardly be able to tell the speed difference between the two, but apparently Intel's is a wee bit faster.  

I want one... My Quad-Core Phenom is starting to bore me. :P

P.S: Expect an octo-core i9 about 216 days after the release of the new iPhone.
« Last Edit: April 27, 2010, 07:27:23 PM by Tokerovin »