Author Topic: AA12 Shotgun  (Read 5678 times)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4ebtj1jR7c&feature=related
 DAAMMNN BOIII

Also look at page 15 of those comments and look at jareismydoll's comment.

SOME PEOPLE JUST NEED TO LEARN THAT ALL GUNS IN MW2 ARE IN REAL LIFE.
« Last Edit: June 16, 2010, 10:13:18 PM by kanew2000 »

SDAISDHASDI MW2 OMG IM LIEK SO GOOD WITH THE BERETTA 50 CAL AND I CAN LIKE NO SCOPE EVERYBODY ALSOI GUNS R SO AWEOME I WANT A FN SCAR NOW

Why would anyone need a rapid fire shotgun anyways? They'd probably hold onto the trigger too long and blow somebody to red sludge when one shot would have already been overkill.

Why would anyone need a rapid fire shotgun anyways? They'd probably hold onto the trigger too long and blow somebody to red sludge when one shot would have already been overkill.
Lol. that made me laugh.

SDAISDHASDI MW2 OMG IM LIEK SO GOOD WITH THE BERETTA 50 CAL AND I CAN LIKE NO SCOPE EVERYBODY ALSOI GUNS R SO AWEOME I WANT A FN SCAR NOW
wat

Why would anyone need a rapid fire shotgun anyways? They'd probably hold onto the trigger too long and blow somebody to red sludge when one shot would have already been overkill.
I think it's semi automatic because of the small recoil. Might be automatic though.

ANYWAYS I WANNA MAKE RED SLUDGE OUTTA DEM TERRORISTS

This gun is made entirely on the principle of "You cannever have too much shotgun."

I think it's semi automatic because of the small recoil. Might be automatic though.
What? A 12 gauge shotshell generates a very high amount of recoil energy, more than enough to cycle an automatic mechanism (recoil, blowback, etc.). You have no idea what you're talking about.

edit: Video says it uses a gas operated mechanism.
« Last Edit: June 16, 2010, 10:26:15 PM by Otis Da HousKat »

What? A 12 gauge shotshell generates a very high amount of recoil energy, more than enough to cycle an automatic mechanism (recoil, blowback, etc.). You have no idea what you're talking about.

edit: Video says it uses a gas operated mechanism.
You say that guy,he barely even moved.

SOME PEOPLE NEED TO LEARN THAT FULLY AUTOMATIC SHOTGUNS HAVE NO ACTUAL PLACE IN ANY MILITARY OR MERCENARY ORGANIZATION AND ARE NOT ONLY RIDICULOUS EXPENSIVE BUT GIGANTIC AMMO-WASTING MACHINES AND ARE LARGELY INEFFECTIVE ON A BATTLEFIELD WHICH IS WHY YOU NEVER SEE A SOLDIER CARRYING AN ARMSEL STRIKER OR AN AA-12, MUCH LESS AN INSURGENT BECAUSE EVEN THEY'RE NOT STUPID ENOUGH TO THINK IT'S A GOOD IDEA. IN-FACT, THERE ARE VERY FEW FULLY AUTOMATIC SHOTGUNS IN THE WORLD BECAUSE THEY'RE SO BATstuff AND THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO USE THEM ARE PEOPLE WITH TOO MUCH MONEY, AND EVEN THEY ONLY SHOOT IT OFF EVERY ONCE IN A WHILE BECAUSE SHOTGUN SHELLS ARE loving EXPENSIVE.

Capslock.

You say that guy,he barely even moved.
External recoil exerted on the user is not the same as total recoil energy generated. You didn't even watch the video you stupid kid, it says the recoil energy is absorbed internally in the gun's frame.

edit:

Capslock.
Indeed. I had the displeasure of buying some more recently. Shotguns are too large and too situational to drag around. A good rifle can be used in almost any situation.
« Last Edit: June 16, 2010, 10:32:46 PM by Otis Da HousKat »

SOME PEOPLE NEED TO LEARN THAT FULLY AUTOMATIC SHOTGUNS HAVE NO ACTUAL PLACE IN ANY MILITARY OR MERCENARY ORGANIZATION AND ARE NOT ONLY RIDICULOUS EXPENSIVE BUT GIGANTIC AMMO-WASTING MACHINES AND ARE LARGELY INEFFECTIVE ON A BATTLEFIELD WHICH IS WHY YOU NEVER SEE A SOLDIER CARRYING AN ARMSEL STRIKER OR AN AA-12, MUCH LESS AN INSURGENT BECAUSE EVEN THEY'RE NOT STUPID ENOUGH TO THINK IT'S A GOOD IDEA. IN-FACT, THERE ARE VERY FEW FULLY AUTOMATIC SHOTGUNS IN THE WORLD BECAUSE THEY'RE SO BATstuff AND THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO USE THEM ARE PEOPLE WITH TOO MUCH MONEY, AND EVEN THEY ONLY SHOOT IT OFF EVERY ONCE IN A WHILE BECAUSE SHOTGUN SHELLS ARE loving EXPENSIVE.

Capslock.
Well said, lol.

External recoil exerted on the user is not the same as total recoil energy generated. You didn't even watch the video you stupid kid, it says the recoil energy is absorbed internally in the gun's frame.

edit:
Indeed. I had the displeasure of buying some more recently. Shotguns are too large and too situational to drag around. A good rifle can be used in almost any situation.
I don't listen. I just watch.

-caps snip-
Alright calm down.

I understand that these shotguns and such are expensive and the shells still expensive too.

Alright calm down.

I understand that these shotguns and such are expensive and the shells still expensive too.
It's not just price;

Indeed. I had the displeasure of buying some more recently. Shotguns are too large and too situational to drag around. A good rifle can be used in almost any situation.
Exactly. They're simply not reasonable in any way, shape, or form. They're over 2x more expensive than a carbine or assault rifle, and they cost more per-shot. Not to mention the recoil, usually low mag (or cassette) sizes, and the fact that it's a loving shotgun. In-fact, shotguns are rarely used in real combat, and police use special shells for them to break down doors. In-fact, "combat" shotguns are usually just modified hunting shotguns. Shotguns are so overplayed in media, people don't realize the only thing a shotgun was designed for was hunting animals (which is why we conceived rifled shotguns and shotgun slugs). FINALLY, there's the stereotype that shotguns are "close range only!" which is largely untrue:

Even birdshot isn't that inaccurate, and the effective range of shot is still pretty goddamn far.