Author Topic: Would you eat a tomato made by a robot?  (Read 2921 times)

It won't be long before you see robots driving taxis.
Considering I live in the suburbs, this doesn't affect me.

A ROBOT TOUCHED IT IT IS NO LONGER FRESH AHHHHH

Where are you getting those pictures? :|

Way2logic.
Please learn to read every detail before posting comments such as that. If you would read the post above yours, you will see that the idea is not literal, and refers to the technology that is consuming various daily aspects of life.


Technology is good. Robots are good. Oromis is just another stupid who doesn't want change.

Technology is good. Technology can do great things, but when technology replaces positive values and morals and intervenes with traditions, it starts to look worse.

forget morals and traditions. They're holding us back. If there's a more efficient way to do it, then do it that way.

A recent study shows that functions of the brain can be altered and enhanced. A wild theory thought up by a group of students was that parents had the choice to implant a chip into their newborn's brain, giving them all the knowledge that there was to offer at the time, and an increased capability of learning.

Huge debates came about because of this. Some argued that their child's mind was not to be tampered with, and that they should grow up being themselves, not some super-intelligent being. The other side argued that the more intelligent children there were, the less problems existed, because opinions would have lesser effect on a child with no morals; a child with only intelligence.

It sounds to me that you are on the side of tampering with humans and morals to gain maximum efficiency, in which case you are on the complete opposite opinion of this thread's idea.

There's a huge difference between picking tomatoes and implanting chips in children's brains.

There's a huge difference between picking tomatoes and implanting chips in children's brains.
I shall state a 3rd time, the tomatoes are an example of an idea. The main idea is that technology is closing around morals and traditions. The implanting of chips was an example to try to further understand your opinion.

Let me ask you this. Will the chips turn the kids into mindless drones? Will the chips turn the kids into clones who think and act identically? Or will it just make them smarter? If all it does is make them smarter then there is no reason not to do it.

I cannot answer that, for that was just a theory. It is possible that the child may lose their mental identity, or it may not. They may retain their morals, or morals will become insignificant data to them. I apologize if my example seemed corrupt in this way.

You can't just give a broad example like that and expect people to make an educated opinion. Just saying "a chip that makes them smart" is not enough information.

I thought I included as many details as necessary in my example.

giving them all the knowledge that there was to offer at the time, and an increased capability of learning.
If all it does is make them smarter then there is no reason not to do it.

ITT oromis is a handicap and doesn't know what fresh means; thinks automatic manufacturing is bad