Author Topic: Best call of duty montage  (Read 13728 times)

Go play Modern Warfare 2 if you're a 'serious player'
MW2 isnt even that good. CoD4 is the best...

national socialist Zombies      >      Titles
Creative guns     >      Emblems

Lol! Look at this guy's name: BLaCKOuTz xX

national socialist Zombies      >      Titles
Creative guns     >      Emblems
the titles and emblems arent the only thing. you obvioiusly didn,t really pay attention to the story mode of CoD 4 or MW2. If people want a zombie game, why dont they just go play L4D or something. 

NOW CAN WE PLEASE STOP ARGUING!!! I WANT THOSE MONTAGES!!! IF ITS WAW FINE!!!!!


bump
1. WAW is better
2. Wunderwaffle(pronounced: Vun-der-vaff-ul)
is a real german word fool, meaning super/wonder weapon in tough translation
3. infinity ward took the whole WW2 thing and turned it into modern stuff


1. WAW is better
2. Wunderwaffle(pronounced: Vun-der-vaff-ul)
is a real german word fool, meaning super/wonder weapon in tough translation
3. infinity ward took the whole WW2 thing and turned it into modern stuff


1. WaW was absolute garbage. The multiplayer was a reskin of CoD4, and that's about it. The Singleplayer was stupid, badly written, and horribly balanced.
2. lol waffles
3. Infinity Ward STARTED Call of Duty, then they broke the chain of stupid WW2 games and created "Modern Warfare", which was absolutely excellent. It was unique, had an amazing soundtrack, was expertly written and directed, and had fantastic multiplayer. I never liked the CoD franchise until I went into CoD4 with virtually no expectations and came out amazed. Hate on MW2 can be legitimatized (too flashy, michael bay, 'unbalanced' multiplayer), but CoD4 was pretty damn close to perfection. The only people who do not like CoD4 are usually bandwagoners, like yourself.

1. WaW was absolute garbage. The multiplayer was a reskin of CoD4, and that's about it. The Singleplayer was stupid, badly written, and horribly balanced.
2. lol waffles
3. Infinity Ward STARTED Call of Duty, then they broke the chain of stupid WW2 games and created "Modern Warfare", which was absolutely excellent. It was unique, had an amazing soundtrack, was expertly written and directed, and had fantastic multiplayer. I never liked the CoD franchise until I went into CoD4 with virtually no expectations and came out amazed. Hate on MW2 can be legitimatized (too flashy, michael bay, 'unbalanced' multiplayer), but CoD4 was pretty damn close to perfection. The only people who do not like CoD4 are usually bandwagoners, like yourself.
So agreeing with someone automatically makes me a bandwaggoner?
K.

1. WaW was absolute garbage. The multiplayer was a reskin of CoD4, and that's about it. The Singleplayer was stupid, badly written, and horribly balanced.
2. lol waffles
3. Infinity Ward STARTED Call of Duty, then they broke the chain of stupid WW2 games and created "Modern Warfare", which was absolutely excellent. It was unique, had an amazing soundtrack, was expertly written and directed, and had fantastic multiplayer. I never liked the CoD franchise until I went into CoD4 with virtually no expectations and came out amazed. Hate on MW2 can be legitimatized (too flashy, michael bay, 'unbalanced' multiplayer), but CoD4 was pretty  @#!*%  close to perfection. The only people who do not like CoD4 are usually bandwagoners, like yourself.
thank you! finally someone with some commen sense

yes
I completely agree. The thing that is the most stupid however, is that Infinity ward has now made single player total stuff. They have spent more time on multiplayer than on creating the story. That is what sickens me most.
Call of Duty 4 was the best in the series, IMO. The campaign was well executed and thought out whereas modern warfare 2 just made a story just so they could release a game for multiplayer purposes. Thats my opinion of it anyways.
Another thing about CoD 4. You basically killed people in multiplayer for ranking up. Nobody had an upper advantage. Now in Modern Warfare 2, there are many different killstreaks, which give people more of an upper hand than others, making it completely unfair.
The only thing I found was a great and creative idea by Infinity Ward was Spec Ops. The Museum was just terrible.

tl;dr i feel that infinity ward spent more time with multiplayer on modern warfare 2 than the campaign and that cod 4's campaign cannot be beaten in the modern warfare games

EDIT:
thank you! finally someone with some commen sense
You're a loving moron for thinking someone has common sense just for giving positive comments on a game you also like
« Last Edit: August 17, 2010, 10:03:44 PM by Muzzles56 »

which give people more of an upper hand than others, making it completely unfair.
What? It's completely fair. Not only can you unlock any killstreak at any given time, but all players can only select from the same list of killstreaks. Being skilled enough to get them in the first place is a bonus to your playing, and avoiding some of the killstreaks isn't absurdly difficult. There is no "upper hand" here, it's balanced the way it is.

What? It's completely fair. Not only can you unlock any killstreak at any given time, but all players can only select from the same list of killstreaks. Being skilled enough to get them in the first place is a bonus to your playing, and avoiding some of the killstreaks isn't absurdly difficult. There is no "upper hand" here, it's balanced the way it is.
Hardline
Hardline's a loving bitch when it comes to killstreaks, however

Hardline
Hardline's a loving bitch when it comes to killstreaks, however
Blah. Just lowers them by one, and even then it's a perk that replaces what could be more useful perks.

I wish I never bought Mw2 for PC.
I already had it for XBOX360 so I should've got CoD4 and afford something else.
Fak.

I completely agree. The thing that is the most stupid however, is that Infinity ward has now made single player total  @#!*% . They have spent more time on multiplayer than on creating the story. That is what sickens me most.
Call of Duty 4 was the best in the series, IMO. The campaign was well executed and thought out whereas modern warfare 2 just made a story just so they could release a game for multiplayer purposes. Thats my opinion of it anyways.
Another thing about CoD 4. You basically killed people in multiplayer for ranking up. Nobody had an upper advantage. Now in Modern Warfare 2, there are many different killstreaks, which give people more of an upper hand than others, making it completely unfair.
The only thing I found was a great and creative idea by Infinity Ward was Spec Ops. The Museum was just terrible.

tl;dr i feel that infinity ward spent more time with multiplayer on modern warfare 2 than the campaign and that cod 4's campaign cannot be beaten in the modern warfare games

i agree that CoD4's multiplayer was totally better. it took more skill. but the campaign mode for MW2 was beast. infinity ward really did mess up on MW2's multiplayer, but the campaign was sick.