Blaze

[*Magick* Mage]

Christianity lies around a strict system of set rules, where as, I don't believe in a specific concept.  I simply believe in nothing, and keep myself open to new ideas, whilst not abiding by them 100%.  The only real proof of anything is mathematics, for it is the only absolute in the universe.  I don't follow up with science, evolution, etc, for it is all theory.  Sure, some of it is reasonable, but I will never use it to forward myself in an argument.

Vat o.o

That didn't really have anything to do with my comment. :o

What I was saying was that you approached him for one reason and proceeded to argue with him about his personal beliefs, later insulting him and his beliefs. Dear, if you don't want him bashing one person because he believes in one thing, don't bash him because you believe in another.

[Ad Bot]

[*Magick* Mage]

Actually, you really didn't approach him. He approached you initial, then you sparked up the "argument".

[Fargeaux]

You don't have to believe in it, it's fact.  You can't disprove mathematics, even if you're from an entirely different system where you've never heard of ours, 2 plus 2 will always equal 4.

dude I hate math.

[Lalam24]

Vat o.o

That didn't really have anything to do with my comment. :o

What I was saying was that you approached him for one reason and proceeded to argue with him about his personal beliefs, later insulting him and his beliefs. Dear, if you don't want him bashing one person because he believes in one thing, don't bash him because you believe in another.

It was a justification.  It's simply the side of nothing(only to believe in fact based concepts that cannot be disproven and never can be), as opposed to the side of something(theory).  The side of nothing should always have the right to believe in that nothing, where as, the other side, should NEVER have the right to approach the nothing, and state that they're wrong.  For, they do not have the proper system to justify it.

[Lalam24]

dude I hate math.

This is your fault.

[Fargeaux]

no, it`s the majorities fault for making me do it every day.

[*Magick* Mage]

It was a justification.  It's simply the side of nothing(only to believe in fact based concepts that cannot be disproven and never can be), as opposed to the side of something(theory).  The side of nothing should always have the right to believe in that nothing, where as, the other side, should NEVER have the right to approach the nothing, and state that they're wrong.  For, they do not have the proper system to justify it.

So basically, you're allowed to believe in nothing and those who do believe in something should never approach you, yet you're allowed to approach them in any manner you please?

[Lalam24]

So basically, you're allowed to believe in nothing and those who do believe in something should never approach you, yet you're allowed to approach them in any manner you please?

Yes.  And you act as if it's an issue, which obviously implies that you're not viewing it properly.  For me to be approached is like saying "Hey, 2 + 2 doesn't equal 4, bro!" it's something that you can't argue with, because it's not opinion.  Where as, I can approach someone else, because what they believe in has yet to be proven, therefore giving me the right.

[Anti-Block]

Yes.  And you act as if it's an issue, which obviously implies that you're not viewing it properly.  For me to be approached is like saying "Hey, 2 + 2 doesn't equal 4, bro!" it's something that you can't argue with, because it's not opinion.  Where as, I can approach someone else, because what they believe in has yet to be proven, therefore giving me the right.

Has anyone really had direct proof that the bing bang happened?
Isn't that just a theory?

[Lalam24]

Has anyone really had direct proof that the bing bang happened?
Isn't that just a theory?

Yes, like I said.  I made this quite clear in one of my earlier posts.  The big bang is a theory, I stated that I never use science to forward an argument.

[Anti-Block]

Yes, like I said.  I made this quite clear in one of my earlier posts.  The big bang is a theory, I stated that I never use science to forward an argument.

So, you don't use science, yet you use math?
"babies are made by 1+ 1"

[TheChaosCarrier]

pfft i use religion to forward arguments!

[Lalam24]

So, you don't use science, yet you use math?
"babies are made by 1+ 1"

And for some reason, you don't see the difference.  Science is produced by math, yes, however math isn't produced from science.
Your quote makes no sense.

[pixl]

no, it`s the majorities fault for making me do it every day.

Math is correct.
It is how things work.

You can thank math for your computer

[Anti-Block]

Science is math, yeah.
Can't really edit that out now. :3
What I really wanted to get at was: Do you believe in the Big Bang?