Author Topic: Blaze  (Read 3609 times)

I'm losing this argument so it has suddenly lost all meaning to me!
gg

gg
I, again, agree with this.  Was going to post something very similar, but decided not to because I've been doing too much of that :x

gg
Good job. You beat a 13-year old kid in a religious debate on a forums for an indie videogame.

it's funny because nobody won.

Good job. You beat a 13-year old kid in a religious debate on a forums for an indie videogame.
If you're going to use the "I'm young so forget you" excuse, then you shouldn't have gotten involved in the first place.

it's funny because nobody won.
I can assure you that the side I was arguing for did, in fact, "win."

If you're going to use the "I'm young so forget you" excuse, then you shouldn't have gotten involved in the first place.
Well, do you feel proud you won the argument? It's evident you do.

Well, do you feel proud you won the argument? It's evident you do.
Actually, I do.  Is that an issue?

Actually, I do.  Is that an issue?
No. It's just odd someone as mature as you would feel proud after winning a religious debate on the Internet.
If it makes you feel any better, I'm devastated. I'm mortified my social image on the forums had been dampened.
What shame! Oh!

No. It's just odd someone as mature as you would feel proud after winning a religious debate on the Internet.
If it makes you feel any better, I'm devastated. I'm mortified my social image on the forums had been dampened.
What shame! Oh!
Are you trying to imply that happiness doesn't exist within maturity?  Even if happiness arises from simple things, it should most definitely not be frowned upon.

Are you trying to imply that happiness doesn't exist within maturity?  Even if happiness arises from simple things, it should most definitely not be frowned upon.
Happiness can't be prove with mathematics.

Happiness can't be prove with mathematics.
Common knowledge: things that currently are.  Sorry, but I don't see what you're trying to do here.

Common knowledge: things that currently are.  Sorry, but I don't see what you're trying to do here.
Nothing, really. I lost the arguement, right? I'm just fooling around.
Also, common knowledge is just a substitute fir a hive-mind.

I argued with him after he bashed someone else out, stating he was trying to "save" him.  Even more so, he stated that the bible was fact.  You should've actually read the IRC, not skimmed through it.  Also, don't nitpick next time.  You seem to do that a lot.
I did read the IRC. What I was basing that you stated the argument upon was when you called him either a "Ten year old" or "Stupid" because he stated there was a "right" Bible, and then you continued on to state that the Bible contradicts itself, that Christians thrive off of denial, et cetera. And he did ignore you after carrying on a small bit, as well as the previous bashing he had performed.

Something you should know here: I don't completely disagree with all the point you made on the IRC and in very few ways do I share what Blaze stated. But I do still feel that neither of you handled this entire situation too well.

I'm through arguing, however. I stand firm upon what I stated in the first place still. But thank you for the nice little argument, or whatever you choose to call it. c:
 

Why does blaze even care of what religon people are. Let people be people