Author Topic: The Weapons Stereotype Thread  (Read 118686 times)



What
k you're missing the joke

Our opinion (but not really) = MW2 is 100% realistic
You said "IMO," which I assume means "in my opinion" unless there's some mystic meaning for it I don't know about.

I was joking because Night Fox mentioned that.

A joke inside a joke..?

I was joking because Night Fox mentioned that.

A joke inside a joke..?
Jokes.
Jokes everywhere.

I'm confused. :c

I learned a lot from this. (I knew almost nothing about guns before I read this)

This topic is lies because in MW2, they show that shotguns shoot ONLY 6 feet.
This was meant to be a joke until,
Yeah man MW2 is 100% realistic.
You thought I was serious
then,
IMO!!!1!
I went along as I thought you were saying a joke.
Our opinion > Fact
But then I thought you were serious so I didn't want you to get mixed up, so I said.
I was joking because Night Fox mentioned that.

A joke inside a joke..?
So I said this so you wouldn't get mixed up as if it were serious.

This was meant to be a joke until,You thought I was serious
then,I went along as I thought you were saying a joke.But then I thought you were serious so I didn't want you to get mixed up, so I said.So I said this so you wouldn't get mixed up as if it were serious.
shut up you both ruined the joke


i never really understood recoil. is it really just a really strong backwards 'push' from the bullet being fired?

Glocks are known to be the most reliable pistols out there, what are you talking about? You could bury a glock and then fire 300 rounds out of it with little problems.
http://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=86896
http://www.sightm1911.com/lib/other/Glock_vs_1911.htm
Quote
One reliability issue which I've seen more with Glocks than other pistols is their occasional failure to detonate primers. While Glock advocates will say that other pistols have the same problem, I've only seen it happen on Glocks. While Glock true-believers are driven to proclaim their guns as the ultimate in reliability, the NYPD has been experiencing extractor problems and double feeds on their Glock 9mms.

This is mostly issues with the Glock 17, but some say that the Glock 19 has fixed some reliability issues. I might be wrong, I pulled up some sources like above, but I clearly remember reading/hearing about why the Glock 17(?) was being phased out, and that there were reliability issues with it.

I also just realized I don't know that much about Glock handguns so there's room for error.

shut up you both ruined the joke


i never really understood recoil. is it really just a really strong backwards 'push' from the bullet being fired?
When the primer is ignited, the propellant explodes. This generates force which propels the bullet out of the cartridge and then the gun. In handguns, that pressure/force is utilized to push the slide back, which ejects the spent cartridge and roosters the hammer (the slide then returns to its normal position which chambers another round. That's what makes it semiautomatic). Recoil is the energy exerted on the gun (and then your arm/shoulder), backwards.
Essentially, it's Newton's third law:
Quote
Third Law: The mutual forces of action and reaction between two bodies are equal, opposite and collinear. This means that whenever a first body exerts a force F on a second body, the second body exerts a force −F on the first body. F and −F are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction. This law is sometimes referred to as the action-reaction law, with F called the "action" and −F the "reaction".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recoil

That's why a .22 round has almost no recoil (there's not that much explosive force), and a 10-Gauge shotgun shell can knock you on your ass. I hope I explained that well.
« Last Edit: August 03, 2010, 06:16:43 PM by yuki »

I was joking because Night Fox mentioned that.

A joke inside a joke..?
I dun get it.


Nice to know I'm not the only one here that knows guns.
« Last Edit: August 03, 2010, 06:24:40 PM by Tom Gunn »



well done, i read the whole thing