LOEL A FURI!

[Wynd_Fox]

What's a zoophyte? And child enthusiast likes prepubescent, so, while it's a bit creepy, he's (probably) not attracted to us.

[Ad Bot]

[King of losers]

Sue is an angry castle.

[Kapturrith]

Sue is an angry castle.

urdoingitrong

[Dusty12]

What's a zoophyte?

A furry but with real animals.

Wants to have love with them and it's illegal.

[Lalam24]

What's a zoophyte? And child enthusiast likes prepubescent, so, while it's a bit creepy, he's (probably) not attracted to us.

So, if it isn't directed at you, you can condone it?  That's loving sick.

[Wynd_Fox]

A furry but with real animals.

Wants to have love with them and it's illegal.

Oh, ew.

So, if it isn't directed at you, you can condone it?  That's loving sick.

No. I was just stating that he's not directing it at us. child enthusiasm is disgusting, however, him being here has little bearing on me.

[Kapturrith]

Bestiality is just plain gross.

[Chrono]

Why wouldn't you?

Do either of those two abominations deserve the right to be on a board of teens, especially the child enthusiast?

I personally don't see the problem as long as no rape or impairment is involved.
But of course, people are taught by media and society to hate everything they hate.

A furry but with real animals.

Wants to have love with them and it's illegal.

Sometimes, things being illegal stop people from doing the right things.

So, if it isn't directed at you, you can condone it?  That's loving sick.

It's only deemed sick because the government wants you to spread your seed with legal adults. They also assume that everyone has loveual thoughts about everything of the opposite love.

Bestiality is just plain gross.

Again, I find other loveual special interestes gross that plenty of people tend to enjoy.

[Lalam24]

No. I was just stating that he's not directing it at us. child enthusiasm is disgusting, however, him being here has little bearing on me.

So, you acknowledge one's child enthusiasm, but yet you choose to ignore the fact that it's there.  Sure is denial in here, son.

[King of losers]

urdoingitrong

Sue is an angry hospital.

[Wynd_Fox]

So, you acknowledge one's child enthusiasm, but yet you choose to ignore the fact that it's there.  Sure is denial in here, son.

I guess? It will only affect me if I choose for it to, and I cannot change it. I don't see the point in worrying about it.

[Lalam24]

It's only deemed sick because the government wants you to spread your seed with legal adults. They also assume that everyone has loveual thoughts about everything of the opposite love.

There's a difference between a bias formed from popular standard and the ability to consider reason.
child enthusiasm is the loveual attraction to children.  You state that it's not an issue unless there's impairment, yes?  For one to be loveually attracted implies that they've gone through puberty; the things they're attracted to are prepubescent, implying that they do not have any form of loveual attraction.  If one has loveual desires with the next, and yet the next has no possible desire, because it's physically impossible at his/her state, then this implies that it's a situation that will impair the opposing person no matter what the case.  The loopholes you're going to throw out include either A: the invasion of personal space, or B: the concept of liking drawn pictures, which may ultimately imply that they're not a child enthusiast after all.

[Dusty12]

I personally don't see the problem as long as no rape or impairment is involved.
But of course, people are taught by media and society to hate everything they hate.

So you find love with animals, regardless of the many fatal diseases it carries ok?

And love with children, even though it scars them mentally and emotionally in ways you can't understand?

Gee you'll be a productive member of society.

[Chrono]

There's a difference between a bias formed from popular standard and the ability to consider reason.
child enthusiasm is the loveual attraction to children.  You state that it's not an issue unless there's impairment, yes?  For one to be loveually attracted implies that they've gone through puberty; the things they're attracted to are prepubescent, implying that they do not have any form of loveual attraction.  If one has loveual desires with the next, and yet the next has no possible desire, because it's physically impossible at his/her state, then this implies that it's a situation that will impair the opposing person no matter what the case.  The loopholes you're going to throw out include either A: the invasion of personal space, or B: the concept of liking drawn pictures, which may ultimately imply that they're not a child enthusiast after all.

Well, of course if it's a young child then it would be a problem regardless. Some people will throw the "child enthusiast" word around at any age that's illegal. Many if not all go through puberty before they're a legal adult and people are still considered a child enthusiast for having attractions towards these people.
Of course, if you're going by strict definition and not the way a majority sees it, it's going to contradict many thoughts and beliefs.

So you find love with animals, regardless of the many fatal diseases it carries ok?

Not every animal gives people fatal diseases. I would also never do it myself.

And love with children, even though it scars them mentally and emotionally in ways you can't understand?

It would really only scar them mentally and emotionally if they didn't want it. I did mention that I was against rape.

Gee you'll be a productive member of society.

I try my best.

[Qwepir]

zoophyte

What are those?
Are they planktons?