Author Topic: LOEL A FURI!  (Read 15861 times)

The law is absolute. Regardless of what you think it's illegal to have love with kids and animals.

And common sense deems it wrong.

Well, of course if it's a young child then it would be a problem regardless. Some people will throw the "child enthusiast" word around at any age that's illegal. Many if not all go through puberty before they're a legal adult and people are still considered a child enthusiast for having attractions towards these people.
Of course, if you're going by strict definition and not the way a majority sees it, it's going to contradict many thoughts and beliefs.
I'm going by the basic age group that of which child enthusiasm targets.  Usually, someone isn't considered a child enthusiast for having love with someone 13+, because, in the common situation, puberty will have already hit.  However, most of these "child enthusiasm" cases run a long the lines of young girls, being under the age of 10, and being raped.  Many men in high school have love with women who are younger, however, they don't consider themselves to be child enthusiasts.

By using the definition for child enthusiasm (which is the obviously proper format in which to use it), it completely draws out your popular standard belief, again.  You keep throwing in "oh anyone under 18 is underage and if they have love it's rape!" when that's not what I'm going off of, and it's obvious that I'm not.

Noedit:

I have a premonition you'll ask me to question the morals of law and at that point I'd like to state the death sentence should be brought back and anyone in jail for more than 30 years be shot.

The law is absolute. Regardless of what you think it's illegal to have love with kids and animals.

And common sense deems it wrong.
As much good as the law does, it also does wrong.

The major reason is that it doesn't take into consideration for the cause of things. Only the fact that these things have been done and that paper deems it wrong.

Common sense shouldn't be considered into something that actually requires complex understanding, especially when it's something a majority, if not all, of humans do not truly understand. I think saying that is enough to make it not actually common.

I'm going by the basic age group that of which child enthusiasm targets.  Usually, someone isn't considered a child enthusiast for having love with someone 13+, because, in the common situation, puberty will have already hit.  However, most of these "child enthusiasm" cases run a long the lines of young girls, being under the age of 10, and being raped.  Many men in high school have love with women who are younger, however, they don't consider themselves to be child enthusiasts.
I understand this, and I do find that wrong.
By using the definition for child enthusiasm (which is the obviously proper format in which to use it), it completely draws out your popular standard belief, again.  You keep throwing in "oh anyone under 18 is underage and if they have love it's rape!" when that's not what I'm going off of, and it's obvious that I'm not.
My points aren't only directed at you, however. You should understand that a lot of people do not take the time to think of actual meanings. I've seen many cases where a teen/young adult was actually called a child enthusiast by others simply for being only two years older.

I cannot believe you're actually trying to argue that child enthusiasm and zoophilia are misunderstood.

My points aren't only directed at you, however. You should understand that a lot of people do not take the time to think of actual meanings. I've seen many cases where a teen/young adult was actually called a child enthusiast by others simply for being only two years older.
Again, I'm going off of the difference between being prepubescent and having gone through puberty already.  A 2 year age difference is fine only if one hasn't gone through puberty.  Otherwise, the other had to have manipulated/they were manipulated in general.  Because they would have no possible desire to have love.

Again, I'm going off of the difference between being prepubescent and having gone through puberty already.  A 2 year age difference is fine only if one hasn't gone through puberty.  Otherwise, the other had to have manipulated/they were manipulated in general.  Because they would have no possible desire to have love.
I agree with this. Again, my points aren't directed at you alone and instead absolutely everyone.
The law states that one cannot have love with one under the age of 16 if they are over 18. Both of these people have (I hope) hit puberty. They are both likely responsible human beings and if the younger one's parents do not believe so and things happen anyways, then they aren't really parents.

I cannot believe you're actually trying to argue that child enthusiasm and zoophilia are misunderstood.
I have reasons. No, not personal history, interests, or anything.

I have reasons. No, not personal history, interests, or anything.
Your reason is that your a damned liberal with a persecution complex who thinks that murderers are just friends that don't realize how speshul you are.

Your reason is that your a damned liberal with a persecution complex who thinks that murderers are just friends that don't realize how speshul you are.
Well that was quite the wild assumption.
Though I'm going to have to deny that.

Well that was quite the wild assumption.
Though I'm going to have to deny that.
OBJECTION! THE DEFENSE voted for Alejandro Wherizwaldo in the last state election, the INDEPENDANT CANTIDATE.


Well that was quite the wild assumption.
Though I'm going to have to deny that.
The more you deny it, the more we know it's true.

The more you deny it, the more we know it's true.
He's denying an assumption, so it implies that what he's denying is true?  What the forget?  Living on stupidity isn't a good thing, bro.

Anybody who ever shows that they're a furry is an idiot and needs to keep their special interestes private.

He's denying an assumption, so it implies that what he's denying is true?  What the forget?  Living on stupidity isn't a good thing, bro.
It was a joke. Have you never heard anyone (generally young kids) say that?