He did, you're acting like he didn't.
I'll go over this with you. After my first statement, he replied with something that was based directly off of "oh hey, I'm going to assume stuff, that'll get me somewhere!" (and to make that point easier)
1. if you were faking being a girl it would obviously be for attention
2. but scream is making a big deal of it.
1. We have yet to establish that Scream is lying, throwing in the obvious point that he's assuming stuff.
2. Did Scream start the topic? No. Scream is going to argue it one way or another because they may want to get the point accross. We don't know, but for him to assume otherwise implies that you think you can determine the cause of someone's actions using generalizations.
My response summed that up. His response didn't even refer back to the main point, but grabbed at the comment referring to my ego.
I think accusing everyone of wanting to hit on a girl over the internet and then calling them pathetic is pretty arrogant; but to each their own, I guess
I asked 2 questions, they were not accusations. For him to assume otherwise, would imply that he's, again, trying to forward an argument by stating that he knows what a person's original implement was, as opposed to them informing you of the initial intent. (denial)
Now then, what point did he establish, Jess?
