Author Topic: What Is A Furcigarette?  (Read 32286 times)

That's called being a murderer. Furries are not murderers.
No but it's still something disgusting that society does not condone.

No but it's still something disgusting that society does not condone.

And so you should definitely present hatred and contempt upon furries, yep.


Neither is a bipedal tiger.
I could personify a television but it wouldn't be human. It would still be a TV.
A sapient bipedal tiger tends to be more akin to human than tigerkind. A TV isn't a living creature.
No but it's still something disgusting that society does not condone.
Depends on the society.

And so you should definitely present hatred and contempt upon furries, yep.
Yes.
Give me a reason not to hate on a disgusting special interest comprised of mostly morons and mentals, that is against what shreds of morals modern society is left with.
A sapient bipedal tiger tends to be more akin to human than tigerkind.
Doesn't make it a human. It is still an animal regardless of whatever facade you decide to shroud it with.

Waiiiiit waitwaitwait. Where does the "disgusting special interest" part come in here?

Waiiiiit waitwaitwait. Where does the "disgusting special interest" part come in here?

furries

derp

Real answer please

Herpies

A special interest is also an irrational or abnormal fixation with something.

People who love animals are abnormal wouldn't you say?

Yes.
Give me a reason not to hate on a disgusting special interest comprised of mostly morons and mentals, that is against what shreds of morals modern society is left with.
Doesn't make it a human. It is still an animal regardless of whatever facade you decide to shroud it with.
What are "morals" precisely? They change as society does. In fact, different cultures have totally different ideas than the Western world.
You're right. It's not human. But it's not an animal like what is commonly thought of. It's neither a tiger completely, nor is it a human.
A special interest is also an irrational or abnormal fixation with something.


That's an obsession. You may want to go look it up.

Quote
According to a study, 19-25% of the fandom members report homoloveuality, 37-48% biloveuality, 30-51% heteroloveual, and 3-8% other forms of alternative loveual relationships.
Copypasta'd from Wikipedia.

Yes.
Give me a reason not to hate on a disgusting special interest comprised of mostly morons and mentals, that is against what shreds of morals modern society is left with.

The amount of special interestes that exist in the world, whether disgusting and repulsive or not, is almost immeasurable. Furry fandom is just one more. I'm saying, ignore it. If it's not affecting your life and your daily living, then why is there any reason at all to condemn it?

Edit:

People who love animals are abnormal wouldn't you say?

I have a cat as a pet and I love him. I myself love animals, but not to the point of loveual engagement, fantasized or not. You can love animals and not be a furry F.Y.I.
« Last Edit: August 16, 2010, 06:07:32 PM by Raeyok »

I did look it up.
Quote
3. An irrational, or abnormal, fixation or preoccupation

What are "morals" precisely? They change as society does. In fact, different cultures have totally different ideas than the Western world.
You're right. It's not human. But it's not an animal like what is commonly thought of. It's neither a tiger completely, nor is it a human.That's an obsession. You may want to go look it up.
Unfortunately, I live in the Western World so I don't give a damn about other societies.

Morals are a motive based on what is right and what is wrong, which come from common sense.
A murderer is bad because he killed people. That's wrong.
A child enthusiast is bad because he scarred kids emotionally. That's wrong.
A man had love with his horse. That is wrong.

Then what is it professor? A Manimal? It's still a tiger. An animal.
It is still an animal regardless of whatever facade you decide to shroud it with.
I have a cat as a pet and I love him. I myself love animals, but not to the point of loveual engagement, fantasized or not. You can love animals and not be a furry F.Y.I.
I understand that and it was a poor choice of words on my part but it's obvious I meant love in a loveual term.

I did look it up.

And from what website is that quote?

Unfortunately, I live in the Western World so I don't give a damn about other societies.

Nice stereotype there. I live in the U.S. as well, and I'm very interested in other societies.

Morals are a motive based on what is right and what is wrong, which come from common sense.
A murderer is bad because he killed people. That's wrong.
A child enthusiast is bad because he scarred kids emotionally. That's wrong.
A man had love with his horse. That is wrong.

The bolded sentence is called bestiality. Bestiality =/= furry fandom.

I understand that and it was a poor choice of words on my part but it's obvious I meant love in a loveual term.

That's what I thought you meant, but I wasn't sure.
« Last Edit: August 16, 2010, 06:15:52 PM by Raeyok »

Bestiality and furry are not the same.

As far as classifying whether anthros is human or animal - they don't exist. Why does it matter?