What Is A Furcigarette?

[Dusty12]

Firstly, there are three definitions there, of which you chose the third and most severe. Secondly, that article is a generalization of all special interestes. It does not strictly address furry fandom.

No, because words only have one meaning. I chose the 3rd one because that's the one I used in context.

Regardless, furryism is a special interest and it falls into that article.

You used the term "Western World," which encompasses over 310 million people.
I see no other reason why someone else would be aroused by animals.

Again, poor choice on my part since I used your choice too. I only give a damn about the US right now, everything else I could care less.
As for your second part, it makes no sense. Why would someone get aroused by an animal unless they loveually liked it?

An animal is an animal.

What you're referring to is called zoophilia, and less than 2% of all furries show an interest in zoophilia, and less than 1% show an interest in plushophilia.

I'm sure you'd admit to a criminal act too, right?

[Ad Bot]

[Raeyok]

No, because words only have one meaning. I chose the 3rd one because that's the one I used in context.

Regardless, furryism is a special interest and it falls into that article.

Indeed it does, however, like I said, that article is not directly referring to furry fandom, so your argument there is invalid. Perhaps if you were to find a more specific, direct article or other source, then it might apply.

As for your second part, it makes no sense. Why would someone get aroused by an animal unless they loveually liked it?

The second part of that was a section of your quote, I did not type that.

An animal is an animal.I'm sure you'd admit to a criminal act too, right?

Simply because someone enjoys bestiality does not mean in any way, shape, or form that they themselves have committed it.

[TheArmyGuy]

I found it particullary amusing to change my avatar to the current one.
Nevermind I found a funnier , non-furry old one.

[Dusty12]

Indeed it does, however, like I said, that article is not directly referring to furry fandom, so your argument there is invalid. Perhaps if you were to find a more specific, direct article or other source, then it might apply.

...What. You're just trying to be stupid to aggravate me, right?
Of course it's general because it refers to special interest as a word. Furryism is a special interest.
I don't see what you mean. I doubt there's a term in a dictionary anywhere that says:

special interest: THE FURRY SPECIAL SECTION.
A special interest is a special interest and being a furry is a special interest.

Simply because someone enjoys bestiality does not mean in any way, shape, or form that they themselves have committed it.

Wasn't the question. Stop trying to avoid it. Chances are if you like something you'll do it.

[Night Fox]

[Dusty12]

On a side note Kyzor, that's from Wiktionary. It defines terms. Not articles about them.

[Raeyok]

...What. You're just trying to be stupid to aggravate me, right?
Of course it's general because it refers to special interest as a word. Furryism is a special interest.
I don't see what you mean. I doubt there's a term in a dictionary anywhere that says:

special interest: THE FURRY SPECIAL SECTION.
A special interest is a special interest and being a furry is a special interest.

Y-- b--.. I don't know how to explain what I'm trying to get across and no matter which way I state it, it won't make much sense, if any. I can tell you that no, I am not acting stupid to aggravate you, I just can't find a reasonable way to state my point.

Wasn't the question. Stop trying to avoid it. Chances are if you like something you'll do it.

I'm not attempting to avoid the question, I simply assumed that it was a rhetorical question, which is why I didn't answer it. To answer it, it really depends on the crime and the motive for such crime, but in general, yes, I'd admit to a crime. Then again, I am not the type that commits crimes, so there would be no crime to which to admit in the first place.

See, no matter what I say, I will never be able to change your opinion on this subject. I could argue my point until I'm blue in the face, but you still wouldn't change your mind. This goes for myself, too. It goes for almost everyone, that's how humans are. Once we form an opinion about something, whether solidly formed or not, we tend to stick to it. I personally just don't understand how one can be hateful of something that doesn't affect one's life at all.

On a side note Kyzor, that's from Wiktionary. It defines terms. Not articles about them.

Yes I know. Also, I'm surprised you remember that I'm Kyzor.

[Previous]

[Raeyok]

-snip-

That's... the same picture...? And from the exact same location?

[oromis]

Yeah i can see why loving candy mountain and that gay ass banner at the bottom.

Aw look at his sig though, it goes through pokemon, touhou, AND blobs D:

[JJA0]

Indeed it does, however, like I said, that article is not directly referring to furry fandom, so your argument there is invalid. Perhaps if you were to find a more specific, direct article or other source, then it might apply.

OK this statement is kind of stupid.


Also question

Is a furry someone who WANTS to be part animal or someone who just role plays it?

Also what is better.
Human with animal characteristics.
Animal with human characteristics.

[Tom Gunn]

...Nice avatar 

[Raeyok]

OK this statement is kind of stupid.

It wasn't directed at you, for one thing, and I already deemed it to not make much sense, so continuing to point out how little sense it makes is needless/pointless.

[JAW959]

The latest group of people that like to feel prosecuted on the internet because they want to forget wolves.

[Raeyok]

The latest group of people that like to feel prosecuted on the internet because they want to forget wolves.

1. Holy stuff, read the entire topic before you post.
2. Ignore it.