Arrogance:
-An attitude of superiority manifested in an overbearing manner or in presumptuous claims or assumptions. (Gathered from Merriam-Webster Dictionary.)
Edit-Inside-Quote: My manner might have been offensive, how ever, i was not acting superior to the admin any farther then saying that he made an error by not reading the rules.
"I am right, you are wrong." Edit: I simply stated that i was proven right. I never stated that the host, or his admin, were wrong.
The argument had been brought to a close, Edit: Not Really. It was cut off at the artery, and left to dangle. yet you merely repeated yourself over and over again, emphasizing on the fact they were wrong and you were right Edit: My argument was not that repetitive.
Whether you realize it or not, you come off as rather arrogant, or pompous, if you'd prefer another adjective.And it isn't just this incident that I gathered it from. Edit: Of course i come off as bloody pompous! Anyone who uses correct spelling in this godforsaken forums is known as "Pompous". The rest of these lines i omitted, due to the fact that i feel i awnsered them with my other responses.
Crop your pictures god damn, I gave up reading early on because of the amount of crap in there, but by the looks of it you pissed off the admins then started arguing with them, good work.
At least of not admins, pissed off random people and started arguing with them, good work.
My apolagies, i didn't want to spend my time cropping picture after picture. Also, if you do not actually read through these pictures, please do not post. i makes you seem to stand on flimsy ground with your arguments. And of course i pissed off the bloody admins, i mean, really. I have pissed off more admins then teamkillers and IRC spammers combined! (Actually, that's just exaggeration. I really just piss off a lot of admins, you get my gist.)
Telling a host that he has bad admins in the server running the place and enforcing rules is saying that the hosts friends (which are generally admins) are not competent enough to have power. If they really aren't good enough for the job then the host will probably take normal action and work things out. Otherwise he'll probably ban you for whining.
Point, Point... However, i pointed out the admins mistake, and then he got pissed off, as did the host, and then the argument lengthened. And i believe the actiops of the admins later in the pictures demonstrates some aspects which would make the admin unfit.
I'll give you credit for originality, but I really have to agree wither the latter statements that you are big-egoed(bear with me, it's hard to make up words on the spot).
For the sake of sanity people, So much of it is sarcasm, it's difficult to find a portion of it that was actaully serious!
When this happens it all boils down to common sense. At a pool it lists that you can't run, fool around, or dive in certain areas. I guess that means I can stuff on peoples towls and pour acid in the water since it is not against the rules, huh?
Spawnkilling is generally frowned upon by everyone and it is a douchebag move. A well known douchebag move. You were simply arguing just for the sake of arguing.
Actually, the admin said he would kick my ass, or something along the lines of, and i took that to mean ban. If you want the full story on my logic for spawnkilling them, i will give it, but i don't think that's nessecary. I simply argued to avoid getting banned. However, then the admin started BS'ing me, by which time i no longer cared about a ban, hence my attitude of superiority.
