Author Topic: Religious Knowledge Survey: Atheists and Agnostics Score the Highest  (Read 15679 times)

You're a moron for not accepting fact.

"Scientist and common sense proved that a ball in fact is round!"
"NO, YOU CAN'T FORCE YOUR stuff ON ME, I BELIEVE IN SQUARE!

something like this

What he calls fact, most people would call belief, seeing as he wasn't there when life was created.

Oasis: Just as bad as preachy Christians.
At least I'm not stuffting on you with the idea of a fake deity.
You are worse than any Christian trying to get people to believe in God. You are forcing your opinion down my throat, but why are you trying so hard? I'm not going to turn into an atheist because you decide to stuff your opinion all over this forum whenever somebody mentions the word: God, religion, bible, death. What is it even going to result in? I really am curious as to why you are trying to hard to make everybody have your precise mindset.
I am not trying to convert anyone, I am an outspoken person. The fact that you keep calling scientific fact opinion is what troubles me, not your particular mindset.
What he calls fact, most people would call belief, seeing as he wasn't there when life was created.
You can enter a forest, see a fallen tree, and gather facts from that. I didn't need to be there to see to have factual evidence that it fell.
« Last Edit: September 29, 2010, 06:13:43 PM by Oasis »

Hey, I can prove that a tree will grow, even though I'm not even going to be there and watch it grow! C:

WhoDa your sarcastic examples cease to amuse me. NOBODY was there when life was created. Nobody was there when anything was created. It's a THEORY and a BELIEF, not fact. It's your decision whether you want to belief that theory, and I call that belief your opinion on the matter seeing as it's what you think and what's not proven. You can never trace a substance back to it's original creator. Tree > Sunlight > Sun > Space > Universe > ? (God, Big Bang, other theories, other religions, etc). If you truely aren't trying to convert anyone, Oasis, then fine, I really don't have a problem with somebody that believes something and doesn't preach

wow you guys
lets NOT let this become a 600 page religion war.

Hey, I can prove that a tree will grow, even though I'm not even going to be there and watch it grow! C:
:D
WhoDa your sarcastic examples cease to amuse me. NOBODY was there when life was created. Nobody was there when anything was created. It's a THEORY and a BELIEF, not fact. It's your decision whether you want to belief that theory, and I call that belief your opinion on the matter seeing as it's what you think and what's not proven. You can never trace a substance back to it's original creator. Tree > Sunlight > Sun > Space > Universe > ? (God, Big Bang, other theories, other religions, etc). If you truely aren't trying to convert anyone, Oasis, then fine, I really don't have a problem with somebody that believes something and doesn't preach
You obviously are just full of stuff. Science can prove everything. The human species as a whole however has not proven our creation, but it can and I hope someday will be done.

Also, the creation of the moon and Earth that I displayed, is fact. The creation of the universe on the other hand, is still unknown.

We know enough to know its stupid.  :cookieMonster:

We know enough to know its stupid.  :cookieMonster:
cigaretteet the power of christ compels you!!!!1

The creation of the universe on the other hand, is still unknown.
This is what gives me +rage.

I as a human being (sadly C:) accept that the universe WAS always there, why can't others?

Why does everything need a source of creation? Why can't a material just be a material without being thousands of tiny things mashed together to create one thing and those one things x thousand to create another thing..?
« Last Edit: September 29, 2010, 06:30:07 PM by WhoDa? »

This is what gives me +rage.

I as a human being (sadly C:) accept that the universe WAS always there, why can't others?
I can logically look at your standpoint. Space and Time, always existing.

I can't rationally accept "God did it in 7 days"

Why does everything need a source of creation? Why can't a material just be a material without being thousands of tiny things mashed together to create one thing and those one things x thousand to create another thing..?
This can't be rationally accepted because it has been proven otherwise.

athests are stupd and will burn in hell lololo

wow you guys
lets NOT let this become a 600 page religion war.
athests are stupd and will burn in hell lololo
Wow you're a hypocrite.

This can't be rationally accepted because it has been proven otherwise.
Yes and this is the sad part about my acception, of that the universe always existed and always was there, since you need something for everything. But I still believe in a always there being universe that existed over infinite amount of years.

You obviously are just full of stuff. Science can prove everything.
This is a lie.

Wow you're a hypocrite.
You all know that atheists are right.

Agnostics need to start caring.

Theists need to go place their hope and faith in the plastic container to their right.
I am not trying to convert anyone
« Last Edit: September 29, 2010, 08:49:32 PM by oromis »